Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Tue Jan 24, 2017 17:04:39 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Tue Jan 24, 2017 17:04:39 IST

Blog Entry# 1833560  
Posted: May 05 2016 (16:48)

2 Responses
Last Response: May 05 2016 (16:53)
Rail News
Other News
May 05 2016 (14:31)   Rail Minister and his deputy go missing during Question hour in Parliament, govt left red-faced

Jayashree ❖ Amita*^   35198 news posts
Entry# 1833560   News Entry# 266846         Tags   Past Edits
Opposition reacted strongly and speaker said such incident shouldn't be repeated. Government on Wednesday faced embarrassment in Lok Sabha when a question relating to Railway Ministry was taken up but both Minister Suresh Prabhu and junior minister Manoj Sinha were absent, leading the Speaker to issue a stricture saying such instances should not recur. The incident happened during Question Hour when Speaker Sumitra Mahajan took up the issue of 'Go-India Smart Card', an initiative of the Railway Ministry, for discussion.
As neither Prabhu, nor Sinha were present in the House, Congress members led by Mallikarjun Kharge strongly protested and wanted to know why the Ministers were absent when the question relating to their Ministry was listed for business in the House. Kharge
said this was not for the first time that a Minister was absent when matters related to their Ministries were taken up. "They (Ministers) are not following rules. Earlier, when a Cabinet Minister was not present, we kept mum. For running the House, Ministers must be present. They are not following rules. It will have a repercussion on you (Speaker), not on them (treasury)," Kharge said. Congress chief whip Jyotiraditya Scindia asked the Speaker to issue a stricture and said "we are fighting for you, Madam". Speaker Mahajan expressed her displeasure over the absence of MoS Sinha, saying "I am sorry, it is unfair" "I was informed that the Cabinet Minister is busy in somewhere else. The MoS was here. But I think he has left. This should not happen. Ministers should be present till the last. This should not happen again," she said. Parliamentary Affairs Minister M Venkaiah Naidu also expressed regret for the absence of the Minister saying it will not be repeated. "The Minister (MoS) was here. But he has left perhaps under the impression that it (the question related to the Railway Ministry) will not come up. I am sorry and it will not be repeated. Minister should be in the House. It is a mistake," he said. Naidu also suggested that the particular question relating to the Railway Ministry should be postponed and taken up on another day.

May 05 2016 (16:48)
srinivasvasanthi   3571 blog posts   13 correct pred (50% accurate)
Re# 1833560-1            Tags   Past Edits
UPA and previous central government usually appoint 2 MoS for Railways.
But NDA reduced to 1 MoS for Railways. So one more MoS for Railways have to be inducted.

May 05 2016 (16:53)
maheshsunda*^~   4326 blog posts   31382 correct pred (71% accurate)
Re# 1833560-2            Tags   Past Edits
If the Cabinet is jumbo sized, you find fault and if it is trimmed also you question the government. It's really a catch-22 situation. This seems to be just a small error on the part of MoS, probably was misinformed by his secretaries, or communication gap and is not such a big issue that it calls for one more MoS.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Fri Feb 3
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Wed Feb 8
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Thu Feb 23
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Wed May 24


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2136570
    Yesterday (12:25AM)

    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 (02:46PM)

    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
  • Entry# 2133126
    Jan 20 (01:29AM)

    The modification to the TL Update scheme - i.e. the introduction of the new RAC System - has led to some efficiency with TL Updates. More TLs are being discussed, and quickly moved up. However, we still have on Average, about 300 Waitlisted TLs in the backlog at any time, and our hard-working and diligent TLMs...
  • Entry# 2126247
    Jan 13 (11:57PM)

    Here are some guidelines for members regarding the new Report button and the revamped FM system: 1. If you have ANY complaint about a blog or ANY other issues, please USE the Report button and file a Complaint. Most complaints are resolved by FMs within seconds/minutes. (Some require further discussion). FMs have...
  • Entry# 2125399
    Jan 13 (08:58AM)

    Often we have some TL Entries seemingly in WaitList forever. Usually, the reason for this is that TLMs have already looked at the TL Entry but are not confident enough to Confirm it or are looking for more inputs from the Member regarding the source, etc. And this delay eventually causes...
  • Entry# 2122843
    Jan 10 (10:15PM)

    This is to address persistent and lingering questions about FM Appointments: . 1. Being an FM is a service. It is NOT supposed to be some kind of "reward" or "medal" to "deserving" members. The ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE of the process is to promptly handle/look into Reports filed by members, which is expected to...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site