Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Thu Jan 19, 2017 07:59:38 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Thu Jan 19, 2017 07:59:38 IST

Blog Entry# 1885704  
Posted: Jun 08 2016 (16:42)

2 Responses
Last Response: Jun 08 2016 (16:48)
Rail News
Other News
Jun 08 2016 (13:06)   Guess who is blocking Modi's Rs 98,000 cr bullet train? Maharashtra's BJP govt

Jayashree ❖ Amita*^   35120 news posts
Entry# 1885704   News Entry# 270352         Tags   Past Edits
This should come as a bolt from the blue for prime minister Narendra Modi. His dream project of the Rs 98,000 crore bullet train has been blocked by BJP-ruled Maharashtra citing huge revenue losses.
According to a report in The Indian Express, the state government is not keen on the project because the Mumbai station as proposed by the Japanese consultants will result in a revenue loss of Rs 10,000 crore. The proposal is to build the station under ground at the Bandra Kurla Complex, says the report.
Representation image. ReutersRepresentation image. Reuters

The reason for the revenue loss is that such a station will render huge tracts of land at the complex not fit for further development. And the railways needs only 0.9 ha of the 28 ha land available at the complex, the report has said.
With the new roadblock, the plan to run the first bullet train in India by 2023 is unlikely to work.
Railway minister Suresh Prabhu had earlier said the first bullet train will run in India in 2023. "In 2023, the first bullet train will run in India. We have already discussed the phases of bullet train project," Prabhu had told PTI.
Earlier last month, a high-level delegation led by NITI Ayog vice-chairman Arvind Panagariya had met Japanese officials in Tokyo to finalise key issues relating to the Rs 98,000 crore Mumbai-Ahmedabad high-speed rail project.
That was the second meeting of the joint committee set up to execute the bullet train project.
During the meeting, the committee was to finalise the schedule of the project, terms related to the appointment of general consultant and procurement conditions.
Besides Panagariya, the Indian delegation comprised A K Mital, Chairman Railway Board, Shaktikanta Das, Secretary Department of Economic Affairs, S Jaishankar, Foreign Secretary, and Ramesh Abhishek, Secretary, Department of Industry Policy and Promotion.
The flagship project is being financed by Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), which is providing a soft loan of about Rs 79,380 crore, amounting to 81 percent of the total project cost.
Since the loan negotiation and finalisation of loan agreement will take some time, the government had requested for a proper schedule of project implementation to achieve timely completion.

Jun 08 2016 (16:42)
simplelive   244 blog posts   554 correct pred (59% accurate)
Re# 1885704-1            Tags   Past Edits
Virar se Ahmdabad simple new four lane track dal do. virar ko kalyan and thane se via vasai thru local train direct connect kar it will best and too much more profitable.

Jun 08 2016 (16:48)
KYN WAP7 🚄 🚃 🚃 🚃 🚃 🚃*^~   5502 blog posts   1509 correct pred (74% accurate)
Re# 1885704-2            Tags   Past Edits
That's a great step... It was really a waste of money... Instead of bullet train. Present rajdhani and shatabdi's speed should be increased..

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Sun Jan 29
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Fri Feb 3
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Sat Feb 18
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Fri May 19


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2126247
    Jan 13 (11:57PM)

    Here are some guidelines for members regarding the new Report button and the revamped FM system: 1. If you have ANY complaint about a blog or ANY other issues, please USE the Report button and file a Complaint. Most complaints are resolved by FMs within seconds/minutes. (Some require further discussion). FMs have...
  • Entry# 2125399
    Jan 13 (08:58AM)

    Often we have some TL Entries seemingly in WaitList forever. Usually, the reason for this is that TLMs have already looked at the TL Entry but are not confident enough to Confirm it or are looking for more inputs from the Member regarding the source, etc. And this delay eventually causes...
  • Entry# 2122843
    Jan 10 (10:15PM)

    This is to address persistent and lingering questions about FM Appointments: . 1. Being an FM is a service. It is NOT supposed to be some kind of "reward" or "medal" to "deserving" members. The ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE of the process is to promptly handle/look into Reports filed by members, which is expected to...
  • Entry# 2115377
    Jan 04 (12:30AM)

    There are some changes to the Forum section. . The Objection feature is now completely GONE. We now only have a "Report Abuse" button. When the Report button is used, an alert is sent to the "Forum Monitor" group. ALL FMs will see an "FM Alert" notification at the top. Thereafter, they will...
  • Entry# 2095722
    Dec 18 2016 (11:34PM)

    Very soon, we shall have a points-system for Timeline updates, Atlas updates, News updates, Blog Tagging, News Tagging, Blog Tagging, etc. The reason for this is that some kinds of updates require more hard work and are more useful than others. Up-to-date News about late-running trains, updating TTs of trains only...
  • Entry# 2034010
    Oct 24 2016 (12:18AM)

    This is to address queries in the Forum about our various Groups - Admin, TL Monitor, FAQ Monitor, etc. . We are not appointing Admins anymore. Before Monitors, we had just one group called the Admin group. Now, we have the various Monitor groups. Our Admins themselves are members of the various Monitor...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site