Disclaimer   
Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Sat Apr 29, 2017 15:19:07 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sat Apr 29, 2017 15:19:07 IST

Blog Entry# 1937817  
Posted: Jul 22 2016 (15:18)

4 Responses
Last Response: Jul 22 2016 (17:15)
  
Rail News
0 Followers
1048 views
New Facilities/TechnologyWR/Western  -  
Jul 22 2016 (15:05)   Diamond Quadrilateral project of Indian Railways High speed rail plans accelerate
 

For Better Managed Indian Railways~   948 news posts
Entry# 1937817   News Entry# 274485         Tags   Past Edits
Encouraged by the success of China in developing a vast high speed rail network, which is now the largest in the world, the Indian Railway is planning to set up its own network of trains criss-crossing the country at speeds approaching 300 kmph.
The Diamond Quadrilateral project envisages connecting the four metro cities of the country – New Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai. The trains will run on broad-gauge tracks covering 14 states across India. The high speed trains are expected to cut travel time dramatically between these cities. For instance, currently the fastest train between New Delhi and Kolkata – the Rajdhani – takes about 17 hours to cover a distance of 1513 kms. A high speed or bullet train will
...
more...
take less than 5 hours. The train would pass through 12 key stations en route New Delhi, including Agra, Lucknow, Varanasi and Patna, according to the feasibility study conducted by Spanish train manufacturer, Talgo. The Spanish counterparts are also seeing competition from the Japanese, Chinese and French high speed train operators to build the network in India. The feasibility report says besides taking lesser time, Talgo trains will also save about 30 pc energy as these trains are more energy efficient than the existing ones.
Vijay Kumar, Executive Director Infra (Mechanical) of the Indian Railway says that Talgo were the first to contact the government about setting up HSR in India, besides claiming that they can raise the speed of trains on the existing tracks to 180 kmph, which is better than the fastest train currently running in India, the Gatimaan Express, which has a top speed of 160 kmph.
Challenges vs. Reality
Though government has projected the Diamond Quadrilateral project as the way ahead for the railways, it comes with numerous pitfalls. Implementing such large-scale infrastructure projects within the time and cost is a challenge in India as is land acquisition, which will certainly come into play for laying dedicated tracks for the HSR. Some railway experts believe that India’s current tracks can be improved to run trains at around 200 kmph, nearly 2.5 times faster than the 80-85 kmph speed that the Rajdhanis move at.
Moreover, the financial viability of HSR is also taken into account as these trains run at loss in every single country where they operate currently, despite the fact that tickets on these trains are often priced higher than an air ticket. For a country where a majority of the population finds even Rajdhani fares beyond its reach, the number of travellers using the fancy HSR would be very limited.
The HSR will arguably soak in the entire budget of the Indian railways, which badly needs to upgrade and modernise its creaking infrastructure as well as add new lines to improve connectivity with the remote parts of the country, which remain cut off even over 70 years after the independence.

  
1835 views
Jul 22 2016 (15:18)
New MAQ MAS Exp via Has Ypr~   4161 blog posts   310 correct pred (69% accurate)
Re# 1937817-1            Tags   Past Edits
Will diamond quadrilateral cover pune and bengaluru en-route ?

  
1582 views
Jul 22 2016 (15:36)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 1937817-2            Tags   Past Edits
Firstly the current operating speed of Rajdhanis is 130/140 kmph and 75-85 kmph is average speed. Even if the speed is increased to 200kmph through improvement in track and rake, the average speed shall practically be 120-125kmph.
500km Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet train project is costing 1 lac crore Rs. Quadrilateral (i.e. interconnection of 4 metros) shall involve construction of about 10000 kms of track shall cost upward of 20lac crore Rs., which leave aside Indian Railways, even the Indian Economy can not bear.
The Mum-Ahm project has become possible due to extremely
...
more...
lucrative loan extended by Japan (JICA) to the tune of 81% at 0.1% interest rate with15 year payment moratorium, and 50 year payback period! Even this most lucrative route of IRlys will most probably find it difficult to get enough passengers, which according to a study must be above 1 lac per day! Passengers in such bulk is possible only if the fares are affordable to middle class passengers, which presently is not the case. Unless Indian Economy grow at astonishingly fast rate in coming years with benefits substantially percolating to middle class and lower class, high speed quadrilateral is a dream! Passengers in such bulk is possible only if the fares are affordable to middle class passengers, which presently are definitely not affordable.

  
1725 views
Jul 22 2016 (16:11)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 1937817-3            Tags   Past Edits
Mumbai-Chennai Arm Shall be definitely touching Pune. Pune could have been covered with Ahmedbad-Mumbai project,was but left out to contain costs. Nothing had been heard so far about the exact route towards Chennai, which is expected to be more or less parallel to the existing line to avoid land acquisition to the extent possible, thanks to extreme difficulties if land acquisition. Actual route depend a lot on what the survey report and market study says.
My wish is to go elevated over the Mumbai--(980) Bangalore--(+350=1330) Chennai Expressway/ Highway. This route may be 1330 km long about 50 km longer for Chennai (1280 km) and about 230 km shorter for Banglore (1210km) than the existing rail route may be a better option
...
more...
from point of view of better area-coverage, revenue & patronage also. Bangaluru probably have more air traffic than Chennai and higher number of passengers are expected from Bengaluru.
Historically there were 4 Major cities- Kolkata-Mumbai-Chennai-Delhi. At the time of independence probably Madras was more populous than Delhi. (1971 figures as far as I remember are 72-59-25-36 lacs respectively.). From national integration point of view, these 4 cities suited well as 4 Metros of India.
But today the above Metro Club is irrelevant. Today there are 3 metros around and above 1.5 crore i.e. Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata. Next is cluster of 4 in 75lacs-1 crore band i.e. Chennai, Bangaluru, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad. Then Pune, Surat are 50lacs+ and so on. When our leaders speak of metro cities of nation, they say Chennai to represent south. But today Bangalore and Hyderabad had grown up and are catching up very fast and cannot be neglected in matter of representing south India.

  
1658 views
Jul 22 2016 (17:15)
New MAQ MAS Exp via Has Ypr~   4161 blog posts   310 correct pred (69% accurate)
Re# 1937817-4            Tags   Past Edits
I wish if this follows existing line, then mumbai - chennai DQ route should go via pune-hubballi-bengaluru or if it goes via pune-wadi-guntakal then definitely they will skip bengaluru and follow the kadapa route and bengaluru will be out of DQ

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Tue May 9
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Sun May 14
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Mon May 29
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Sun Aug 27

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)


    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 2017 (09:53AM)


    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 2017 (11:40AM)


    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 2017 (11:05AM)


    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 2017 (12:25AM)


    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)


    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site