Disclaimer   
Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Mon Feb 20, 2017 14:45:37 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Mon Feb 20, 2017 14:45:37 IST

Blog Entry# 2056049  
Posted: Nov 11 2016 (11:41)

15 Responses
Last Response: Nov 11 2016 (20:46)
  
Timeline
0 Followers
1091 views

debarathi mandal
Nov 11 2016 (11:52)
Loco number fixed nehi
Nov 11 2016 (11:24)   Cholan Express/16854   Train - Loco

12622 king of SR~   540 Conf TLs   28 Void TLs
Attach: ED/WAP-4/22360 VM/Villupuram Junction->MS/Chennai Egmore

Nov 02 2016 (16:29)   (previous value)
Timeline Entry# 1033687
by: Aditya Siddharth
Attach: AJJ/WAP-4 VM/Villupuram Junction->MS/Chennai Egmore

10 posts - Fri Nov 11, 2016

  
479 views
Nov 11 2016 (20:30)
LHB Bikaner Kochuveli^~   78601 blog posts   5088 correct pred (78% accurate)
Re# 2056049-11            Tags   Past Edits
I tried what you said and found out that there is no bug.
I went to page of WDP4B 40085
I clicked on add train
I got page which very clearly said Attach WDP-4B-40085 to train
.
...
more...

Overall the page clearly tells that I would be adding a specific loco number to a train which is against site policy so i stopped.

  
382 views
Nov 11 2016 (20:33)
LHB Bikaner Kochuveli^~   78601 blog posts   5088 correct pred (78% accurate)
Re# 2056049-12            Tags   Past Edits
Anyways I think that this option may be removed altogether because as per site policy we canot add specific loco number to a train.

  
460 views
Nov 11 2016 (20:35)
AP™^~   1396 blog posts   363 correct pred (93% accurate)
Re# 2056049-13            Tags   Past Edits
Right, and now add a train in this page from station X to station Y, which you might have seen with this loco. Ok?
Now you will be expecting that this train will get added here in this loco page. Right?
But I am 100% certain, that it's not gonna happen. Instead, this specific loco (with this road number) will get added in that particular train page. And that's where the problem is, because it's against the policy.

  
440 views
Nov 11 2016 (20:40)
LHB Bikaner Kochuveli^~   78601 blog posts   5088 correct pred (78% accurate)
Re# 2056049-14            Tags   Past Edits
Sir then how can it be a bug...Page is very very clearly telling that it will add specific loco number.
If page was not telling this clearly then it could be a bug or a case of misleading info.
PS - Iam assuming that blogger who is doing TL update would be aware of site rules for adding locos.

  
441 views
Nov 11 2016 (20:46)
AP™^~   1396 blog posts   363 correct pred (93% accurate)
Re# 2056049-15            Tags   Past Edits
Are bhai. Here I am simply looking for the different trains which this particular loco has hauled, and NOT what are the different locos which have hauled this train. Yeh button ka matlab hai ki is specific loco ne kaunsa kaunsa train ke sath tha, aur us traino ka list is page mein hi rehna chahiye. Lekin, uske jagah is loco direct us train ke page mein add ho raha hai. Mujhe loco ke page mein us traino ka list chahiye, woh train ke page mein yeh loco nahi. And this is the problem.
.
Anyways,
...
more...
I can't explain it to you simpler than this. If you still haven't got my point, then I apologize. It's my last reply here in this blog. Thanks. :)

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Thu Mar 2
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Tue Mar 7
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Wed Mar 22
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Tue Jun 20

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 (09:53AM)


    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 (11:40AM)


    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 (11:05AM)


    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 (12:25AM)


    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 (02:46PM)


    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
  • Entry# 2133126
    Jan 20 2017 (01:29AM)


    The modification to the TL Update scheme - i.e. the introduction of the new RAC System - has led to some efficiency with TL Updates. More TLs are being discussed, and quickly moved up. However, we still have on Average, about 300 Waitlisted TLs in the backlog at any time, and our hard-working and diligent TLMs...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site