Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Tue Feb 28, 2017 08:54:15 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Tue Feb 28, 2017 08:54:15 IST

Blog Entry# 2070809  
Posted: Nov 25 2016 (11:50)

3 Responses
Last Response: Nov 25 2016 (17:26)
General Travel
Nov 25 2016 (11:50)   NZB/Nizamabad Junction (3 PFs)

phaniraj1274~   87 blog posts
Entry# 2070809            Tags   Past Edits
mr.rizwan,can we expect the train operations in pdpl-nzb route by the end of march 2017 after over all construction of briges and installation of signals and gates or it may take more time?
are there any chances of extending tpty-krmr bi-weekly superfast express till nzb?
will the cr officials will agree for the proposal of extending the passenger train pandharpur-nizamabad till peddapalli junction
according to the new railway time table released on october 1st 2016.the pushpull passenger train from peddapalli-jagityal will be extended till morthad of nzb district,i think by the end of next year they may extend till nzb isn't it?
can't the ecor/scr officials divert this weekly train vskp-snsi-vskp express 18503/04 via kzjt-pdpl-nzb instead of running it via kzj-sc-kmc-nzb already from kzj-snsi there are 3 more trains along with this train to shirdi and nagarsol they are;-
bza-snsi-bza weekly express(via sc-vkb-bdr-ltrr-prli-pbn-awb-mmr-pb)17207/08
cct-snsi-cct tri-weekly express(via sc-vkb-bdr-ltrr-prli-pbn-awb-mmr-pb)17205/06
ns-nsl-nsl five times in a week express (via sc-kmc-nzb-mue-pau-pbn-awb-mmr-pb)17213/14
so what's wrong in diverting this weekly express 18503/04 vskp-snsi-vskp via pdpl-nzb. instead it will give a better connection for the districts of pdpl,krmr,jgtl and nzb people for conveniently travelling to shirdi,aurangabad,nanded,basara,vijayawada and visakhapatnam,rajahmundry.
and compared to the trains mentioned above running in two different routes from sc-vkb and sc-nzb. pdpl-nzb route is a short cut route for vskp/ns/cct/mugr/kzj people when compared to the above mentioned two routes and travel time will be less when compared with those routes
and already kzj-sc route is fully congested with passenger and good's trains.so there will not be any problem in diverting this weekly express train via pdpl-nzb.so think once and forward mine request to ecor/scr officials.
and even one more express train from vskp-ned-vskp tri-weekly express 18509/10, should be diverted via kzjt-pdpl-nzb instead of running via kzj-sc-nzb.
alreadyfrom vskp-sc-vskp there are so many trains daily like:-
falaknuma superfast express,east coast express,konark express,visakha express,janmabhoomi superfast express,godavari superfast express,gareebrath superfast express,ltt-vskp-ltt express so 8 daily trains
and weeklies from vskp-sc-vskp:-
shalimar-secbad-shalimar a.c superfast 12774/73 weekly,shalimar-secbad-shalimar superfast weekly 22849/50,bhubaneshwar-pune-bhubaneshwar weekly superfast express 22882/81,
guwahati-secbad-guwahati weekly superfast express 12514/13,tatanagar-yeshvantapur-tatanagar 18111/12 weekly express,nagawali tri-weekly express 18309/10 sbp-ned-sbp,vskp-sc-vskp a.c superfast express 12783/84,22203/04 vskp-sc-vskp duronto a.c superfast express,vskp-snsi-vskp 18503/04 weekly express,18509/10 vskp-ned-vskp tri-weekly expres
so from sc-vskp there are 8 daily trains and 10 weekly/tri-weekly express trains are there
so what's wrong in diverting vskp-snsi-vskp 18503/04 weekly express and 18509/10 vskp-ned-vskp tri-weekly express via kzjt-pdpl-nzb route,instead of running it in kzj-sc-nzb.so please consider the above factors and request the railway authorities and forward this proposal of diverting these two trains in the newly laid pdpl-nzb route
so whatever i spoke is 100% true and agreeable and satisfactory for everyone.so consider this

Nov 25 2016 (16:06)
Rizwan NZB Jn~   223 blog posts
Re# 2070809-1            Tags   Past Edits
First of all I am not a railway guy :) What I am going to write below is just my thinking (some official statements have also been released). I appreciate the way you made efforts in typing such large text. For any references you can check this forums recent posts. Thanks.
1. Since there are works still going on near Nizamabad, it may take 2 more months to put an end to this project. Though passenger trains won't run this early we can expect the goods/freight trains to start from March 2017 or mid year. The passenger trains may start in late 2017.
I think an official statement has already been released that the NZB-LTT would be extended as KRMR-LTT while the KRMR-TPTY SF would be run as NZB-TPTY SF.
3. There are no chances of extending Pandharpur-Nizamabad till Peddapalli because the NZB-PVR already takes 18 to 20 hours covering 550KM. There may be train such as NZB-PDPL or NED-PDPL Pass etc
4. Though the NZB-SC route has many trains that go towards Kazipet-Warangal-Vizag, the main source of traffic in these trains is from SC. SCR or ECoR should consider diverting 18510/Nanded - Visakhapatnam Express or 18310/Nanded - Sambalpur Express via NED-NZB-PDPL (atleast tri-weekly). Sainagar Shirdi - Vishakapatnam Express can also be diverted but its just a weekly train.
5. Regarding your another post KAMAREDDI-SIRPUR TOWN VIA NZB, this is unlikely because the loco has to be reversed at NZB. Instead there may be NZB-PDPL or NED-KRMR Pass as I already said.
6. Since NZB/KRMR does't have connectivity to New Delhi, I hope SCR runs a train 12723/Telangana SF or 12721/Dakshin SF from SC-NZB-PDPL instead of SC-KZJ. Or divert a NED-New Delhi train via NZB-PDPL.
Hope I answered most of the questions and there may be or may not be the possibility of happening or it may take up lot of time. We have to wait and see.

Nov 25 2016 (16:57)
Foamer~   1303 blog posts
Re# 2070809-2            Tags   Past Edits
Great sir. I hope that passengers start sooner with political pressure. It works with SCR not SWR. Especially with high level people showing interest in this line. The last suggestion of NDLS train re-routing is correct. If possible a Telangana SK could be run on that route, but I don't think so will happen.
Rest assured that SCR will surely run decent no. of passengers.

Any survey or progress on that Bidar line?
A lot of people do travel from Bidar to NZB, but no bus at all. Because some part of MH (Degloor) comes in between so problem of permit.
Also PM had visited Telangana few months back to inaugurate a line. Its not shown on Atlas. Which was that?

Nov 25 2016 (17:26)
A good day ahead~   2356 blog posts
Re# 2070809-3            Tags   Past Edits
Excellent, sir! It would be useful to re-route some TPTY or VSKP bound weeklies through this new route to connect this portion to AP. A new train to Chennai starting from AWB/NED via this route may also work out.
The NDLS connection may not be possible though. Telangana SF can be ruled out as it will never be diverted in anyway and Dakshin's sip train arrangement with VSKP Link SF also rules out Dakshin.
The additional 120km + reversal at NZB, pretty much rules
out any chances of diversion of any existing long distance train from SC towards PDPL. The route may primarily be used for south bound trains or west bound trains from NZB. An intercity the likes of SC-SKZR can be introduced in this route as a clone train of the one running on the main line.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Fri Mar 10
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Wed Mar 15
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Thu Mar 30
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Wed Jun 28


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 (01:22PM)

    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 (09:53AM)

    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 (11:40AM)

    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 (11:05AM)

    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 2017 (12:25AM)

    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)

    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site