Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Wed Feb 22, 2017 10:04:47 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Wed Feb 22, 2017 10:04:47 IST

Blog Entry# 2074358  
Posted: Nov 28 2016 (22:21)

19 Responses
Last Response: Nov 30 2016 (10:26)
Rail News
Other NewsSER/South Eastern  -  
Nov 28 2016 (22:17)   Home / Jamshedpur / MP meets Railway Minister, demands over-bridge construction at Jugsalai mp-meets-railway-minister MP meets Railway Minister, demands over-bridge construction at Jugsalai

Rail Fanning~   134 news posts
Entry# 2074358   News Entry# 287050         Tags   Past Edits
The MP of Jamshedpur Vidyut Varan Mahato met Union Railway Minister Suresh Prabhu in New Delhi on Friday to demand commencement of construction work for the proposed railway over-bridge (ROB) in Jugsalai near the railway level crossing.
He also requested the Railway Minister to order construction of railway over-bridges in Gadra and Asanbani (both near Parsudih) at the earliest.
During the meeting, the MP also raised demand a new train service from Tatanagar to Jaipur via New Delhi. He also demanded new train service from Tatanagar to Ernakulam or any other stations adjoining
Ernakulam such as Trivendram, Mangalore, Kochivali or Kanya Kumari.
He further asked the Railway Minister to run a new train from Tatanagar to Howrah with departure time of 8.30 am and another down train from Howrah to Tatanagar with the departure time of 7.30 pm. Other demands raised by him include running a new train from Tatanagar to Buxar via Patna besides starting a train service from Tatanagar to Jainagar till the Nepal Terai region and a another train from Tatanagar to Alleppey or Mysore, Nagarkoel or Trichy stations.
Mahato reminded Prabhu about the latter’s announcement to extend the route of Purushottam Express from New Delhi to Jaipur. He said a new train should be run till Jaipur if extending the route of Purushottam Express was fraught with problems of any sort.
Speaking about the proposed ROB in Jugsalai, the MP said that the project had received approval five years ago and that the state government had given consent regarding its participation in the project besides providing land for the same. Despite clearance of approval and land, the railway authorities are showing slackness in starting the project, Mahato alleged.
Mahato apprised the Railway Minister that every year 30-40 people lost their lives while crossing the railway level crossing in Jugsalai. He said the rail route through Jugsalai was very busy since Kolhan was an industrial region. Hence the railway authorities should not delay the construction work any further, Mahato told Prabhu.
The MP also asked the Railway Minister to ensure commencement of work on extension of new railway lines from Chandil to Jhargram via Patamada and Bandowan, Chakulia to Budamara of Bangreposhi via Baharagora and from Kandra to Namkum (Ranchi).
He said the Jan Shatabdi Express running from Howrah should be given a five minutes halt at Ghatsila station and that the Jalianwala Bagh Express should be run four days a week instead of the current two days a week schedule.
He also demanded renovation of the Ghatsila platform and beautification of Galudih, Rakha and Govindpur stations apart from demanding construction of halts between Ghatsila and Dhalbhumgarh near Chirudih and between Haldipokhar and Bahalda (Odisha) near Siddhi Sai

2 posts - Mon Nov 28, 2016

12 posts - Tue Nov 29, 2016

Nov 29 2016 (13:09)
Boxer Bhai~   38143 blog posts   12667 correct pred (61% accurate)
Re# 2074358-15            Tags   Past Edits
If tata- cape run via tvc
Cape paxs will say tvc dumping trains

Nov 29 2016 (15:17)
Rail Fanning~   2574 blog posts
Re# 2074358-16            Tags   Past Edits
On the one hand they say TVC is dumping trains and on the other hand if it is Nagercoil, then it is not dumping !!! But within the options given a separate rake for Tata-Allp seems a very food option. There is lot of talk which was heard abt Tata-Allp having a revised time of 22:30 dep from Tata [which was its earlier time & being extended till TVC)...but all those were just rumours, nothing actually materialised.

Nov 29 2016 (22:04)
IR RAILS On SAIL BHILAI TRACKS~   1997 blog posts   126 correct pred (68% accurate)
Re# 2074358-17            Tags   Past Edits
TATA JP - Valid but if it runs via BSP if it goes to CIC it will became White Elephant as like SRC AII.
TATA South - Badly needed Allepy is already running full also because of short rake of allepy this train can be get more load.
TATA JAYNAGAR - valid only if via Darbhanga if it goes to another route will not get success like what they want.
Buxer - inappropriate demand.

Nov 29 2016 (22:08)
IR RAILS On SAIL BHILAI TRACKS~   1997 blog posts   126 correct pred (68% accurate)
Re# 2074358-18            Tags   Past Edits
TATA Allp is short rake i think if i am correct only 2 AC and 5 SL and 1 GS its very short to hold the south bound pax burden thats why demand going on to get TATA Kochuveli,
yes TATA JP via CIC run for Khatu shyam maharaj Mela Special but that only for CM Tirth Darshan yojna registered pass.

Nov 30 2016 (10:26)
Rail Fanning~   2574 blog posts
Re# 2074358-19            Tags   Past Edits
Instead of asking for a new full fledged train, if they can increase rakes of Tata Allp itself and make it a separate train with revised time and bit of speeding up, that itself will solve lots of issues.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Sat Mar 4
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Thu Mar 9
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Fri Mar 24
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Thu Jun 22


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 (09:53AM)

    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 (11:40AM)

    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 (11:05AM)

    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 (12:25AM)

    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)

    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
  • Entry# 2133126
    Jan 20 2017 (01:29AM)

    The modification to the TL Update scheme - i.e. the introduction of the new RAC System - has led to some efficiency with TL Updates. More TLs are being discussed, and quickly moved up. However, we still have on Average, about 300 Waitlisted TLs in the backlog at any time, and our hard-working and diligent TLMs...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site