| Entry#: | |
| HashTag: | |
| Member: | |
| Posting Date Range: | |
| Train: | |
| Station: | |
| Search Phrase: | |
RailMark Mode | Timeline UpdatesTrip UpdatesNews PostsPvt PostsAdmin PostsFollowed PostsChat RequestsBlog PostsPNR Posts Disclaimer | |||||||
| ||||||||
Post a Comment/Question/Picture/VideoPost a Comment/Question/Picture/Video Super Search Topics: **new Filters: | Rail News
New Trains
Site Announcements
Active MembersActive IRCTC Ticket Agents
Admin Blog LinksRail Websites by our Admins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blog Entry# 324140 Posted: Jan 10 2012 (12:39PM) 72 Responses Last Response: Jan 11 2012 (4:11PM) I was thinking of a new LHB AC Duronto Train from Guwahati to New Delhi which can run on Tri - Weekly Basis. It can have the following TECHNICAL Halts :- Kanpur Cantral, Mughalsarai, Patna Jn, Barauni and New Jalpaiguri. --------------------- Please give your comments and opinions without scolding me :-) ghy-ndls & ghy-hwh/sdah/koaa needs duronto. atleast i would suggest non ac lhb duronto for ghy-ndls(since we have a rajdhani already running) bi-weekly would be a good option and an AC duronto(LHB/ICF) between ghy-hwh/sdah/koaa (Bi-weekly) sharing the same time slot as garib rath. what say ?? 48 posts - Tue Jan 10, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 14 posts - Wed Jan 11, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 1:-other thn rajdhani exp rest are same or less 2:- there was announcement to run a rajdhani weekly exp but RM was changed and everything gone. if suppose a rajdhani was introduced between bgp-sbg route thn surely speed will be same but not less thn 46 km sir i didnt say sln jn , its not my concept ,,, am talking abut lko-ghy SF ,, im happy at least u r agree tht lko-ghy reqierd new SF train Jan 11 2012 (1:07AM) ↑⇑ ↓⇓ ←→ ★··´¯··★ кιиg σf ιя внσραℓ ѕнαтαв∂ι ★··´¯··★ 16747 blog posts 15357 correct pred (66% accurate) sir you forgot to add NDLS-BPL route in A class Kindly get over from guess work or fantasy plz!! Then y Exp @ Sahibganj section arnt running over 46 AVG??? Who stopped them increasing MPS to maximize AVG?? or Are they awaiting Rajdhani introduction??? Brahmputra Mail too manage 46 KMPH in this section!!?? While the BJU-KIR-SPJ is running over 55 KMPH even for Exp!! Yes, if Raj run, then its MPS will again get increased!! But is Raj running as of now?? Announcement done but didnt imposed cant be taken as MPS for the track. Get away from definition & fantasy. Kindly discuss reality!! I have drawn the following conclusions from this thread :- ------------------ GHY-NDLS Fully AC Duronto Exp Idea rejected by many. GHY-NDLS Partially AC Duronto Exp Idea accepted by some. GHY-NDLS AC SF Exp via Kanpur-Patna Idea accepted by many. GHY-NDLS AC SF Exp via Lucknow-Chapra Idea rejected my many. ------------------ PS : So an LHB AC SF Train with limited number of Commercial Stoppages via the Kanpur-Patna-Barauni-New Jalpaiguri Route is essential for connecting Guwahati with New Delhi. It's so as such a train may do well than... Read more... Try for Non LHB coaches so be accepted by many more. P.S: You conclusion arrangement is done like a Politician (Ministers) who changes BILLS in the Assembly to get approved. One point I want to re-iterate: Even Purvottar SK does not skip Katihar, although it coolly skips Patna and Barauni. Rest, all the Best...! (reason told before) Actually, I had forgot about mentioning Katihar Jn, it was not deliberate. This stoppage can replace Kisanganj as it's a Bigger Station for such a train :-) I had put forward such a conclusion arrangement because there were many arguments & counter arguments stating various alternatives, clubbed in one thread. I had just channelized these views in general to give some clarity. ------------------ PS : I have proposed for LHB AC Coaches as it would run faster at least between New Delhi and Mughalsarai + I don't support Non-AC Coaches in such a train so that Chain Pulling & entry of unauthorized people between Mughalsarai and New Jalpaiguri can be kept to the minimum :-) Blog Entry Archived. Debate has reached it's conclusion :-) |
Scroll to Top