| Entry#: | |
| HashTag: | |
| Member: | |
| Posting Date Range: | |
| Train: | |
| Station: | |
| Search Phrase: | |
RailMark Mode | Timeline UpdatesTrip UpdatesNews PostsPvt PostsAdmin PostsFollowed PostsChat RequestsBlog PostsPNR Posts | |||||||
| ||||||||
Post a Comment/Question/Picture/VideoPost a Comment/Question/Picture/Video Super Search Topics: **new Filters: | Rail News
New Trains
Site Announcements
Active MembersActive IRCTC Ticket Agents
Admin Blog LinksRail Websites by our Admins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blog Entry# 383743 Posted: Mar 30 2012 (12:02AM) 83 Responses Last Response: Jul 03 2012 (11:35AM) Mathura jn halt deleted for 12724 source indianrailways website..... plz update it 3 posts - Fri Mar 30, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 12 posts - Sat Mar 31, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 10 posts - Sun Apr 01, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 3 posts - Mon Apr 02, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 1 posts - Sun Apr 22, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 1 posts - Mon May 21, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 1 posts - Sun Jun 10, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. Balharshah has got Base Kitchen facility and it cannot be removed. Even Rajdhanis and Durontos have a technical halt there. Chandrapur, being a small station can be removed. If people from Chandrapur city want to board this train, they can do some bus/taxi arrangement till Balharshah. Now, the road connectivity to Balharshah is something which can be improved ASAP. Or else, people from Chandrapur can board Dakshin SF Express. 10 posts - Thu Jun 28, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 4 posts - Fri Jun 29, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 15 posts - Sun Jul 01, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 15 posts - Mon Jul 02, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. 30 minutes delayed departure from NDLS would again be not preferred by the authorities. Firstly that would mean overtake of Dakshin @ Palwal or Kosi Kalan & secondly the schedule of most trains running ahead of TN would require alteration since TN can not go on overtaking all trains which comes in its way. IMHO TN is having a good schedule & should not be changed. But at the same time, the overtake by YPR Duronto can be avoided. Jul 03 2012 (1:13AM) ↑⇑ ↓⇓ ←→ Koush IRF** 18350 blog posts 1073 correct pred (73% accurate) Ph:+918233436466Just to avoid one overtake change whole schedule is asking too much Overtake by YPR duronto is a weekly affair and so it will not have much impact on running schedule of TN. To avoid overtake of TN by Duronto one cannot make TN overtake 10 trains enroute by changing the schedule. Jul 03 2012 (1:22AM) ↑⇑ ↓⇓ ←→ Koush IRF** 18350 blog posts 1073 correct pred (73% accurate) Ph:+918233436466Yes , agree completely Agreed. I wish this train could run the way it used to run earlier when it was introduced. Anyway, it is still a great train. I hope IR does not add any halts to this train. Let TN maintain its glory with the current schedule. No more halts required. |