Disclaimer   
Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:28:26 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:28:26 IST
PostPostPost Trn TipPost Trn TipPost Stn TipPost Stn TipAdvanced Search
Filters:

Blog Posts by rishidigital1055
Page#    1 Blog Entries  
  
Quiz
0 Followers
1910 views
0 votes
Mar 14 2015 (16:40)   12420/Gomti Express
 

rishidigital1055   1 blog posts
Entry# 1396547            Tags   Past Edits
I have a very interesting question. Before coming to the question, let me first explain something about the situation. On 11th March, 2015, I came to this website to check the arr/dep trend of the 12420 at NDLS to give me some hope that on 6th May, the day I will have to catch an International flight from DEL T3 at 2100, the train will not be delayed by a significant time. So, as I checked the trend, I also noticed that 12419/12420 share rake with 14211/14212. I don't have any expert knowledge of rake sharing in IR from any resource. By logic only, I'm deriving the knowledge here. Logically, by rake sharing, I mean that only after a train, lets say T1, running from A to B, reaches B, then only the train T2, running from B to either back to A or to some C (which is same case...
more...
in my scenario of interest, i.e. first from A to B to C then from C to B to A and so on in loop) and sharing rake with T1, can depart from B. Now, if I believe I'm right in thinking about rake sharing in IR, then the "late" arrival time of T1, lets suppose TaT1, at B should also be closely linked to the "late" departure time of T2, lets suppose TdT2, at B. I found this hypothesis to be somewhat true after I crosschecked by rigorously comparing the (actual) arr/dep history data (on 11 Mar 2015) for all the train pairs i.e. 14211(T1)(A to B)/12420(T2)(B to C), 12420(T2)(B to C)/12419(T3)(C to B), 12419(T3)(C to B)/14212(T4)(B to A) and 14212(T4)(B to A)/14211(T1)(A to B). Lets say TaTis is 's'cheduled time of 'a'rrival of train Ti and TaTia is 'a'ctual time of 'a'rrival of train Ti. I observed that if (TdTjs-TaTis)=x then (TdTja-TaTia)=x +- 1 hourmax (+- 30 minutes in most cases). So, for pair 12419(T3)(C to B)/14212(T4)(B to A), TaT3 scheduled (TaT3s) is 1455 and TdT4s is 1735 at B (NDLS) on same day i.e. TdT4s-TaT3s=0240 hrs. I believe (logically arriving at the it) it means that Bogies in the rake are not cleaned at the yard since the layover is only 0240 hrs. But there was one case on 3rd March in particular, when my hypothesis failed. Lets discuss that case. On 3 March, TaT3a was 2359 (late by 0904hrs) and TdT4a is 0010 (on 4 march) (late by 0635hrs). So, it means the layover was only 11 minutes (TdT4a-TaT3a=0010 hrs). Now, my question is if we believe the data on the website to actually reflecs the arrival and departure time of the two trains, is something like this even possible in reality considering the logistics of operations in an Indian railway station? Also, if any of you think that there is any (unintentional) flaw in the way I've described the situation, please feel free to ask.
Thanks.

  
1725 views
Mar 14 2015 (16:47)
arkgood~   2268 blog posts   3943 correct pred (74% accurate)
Re# 1396547-1            Tags   Past Edits
Welcome in IRI

  
1717 views
Mar 14 2015 (17:06)
RF Z ▶NEVER BOARD A MOVING TRAIN◀*^~   11217 blog posts   2561 correct pred (84% accurate)
Re# 1396547-2            Tags   Past Edits
Well, it took me three reads to get the entire idea. Maybe my bad but yay! I made it! Anyways. You were spot on in your research and I'd try iron out the little doubts that remain.
Yes the two trains do share rakes and the arr/dep of first to the other is closely governed by the mathematical(ish) equations jotted down.
Yes the train does not go to yard for cleaning because the rake belongs to Lucknow division, NR and the 6 hour mandatory maintenance is due at Lucknow, not at NDLS
...
more...
not at AGC.
Besides the primary maintenance, there's a three hour secondary maintenance which is due at Agra Cantt. (AGC).
Once the primary and secondary maintenances are taken care of, in case of delays, halt at NDLS is kept as brief as possible. There's a loco reversal and a different loco takes the charge towards AGC. If hastily done, such a reversal is easily possible in the lie-over of 11 minutes. This is expedited because if the train fails to reach AGC by 03:00, the next day's run will be rescheduled.
You can see that due to some unforeseen reason the 3rd march departure got hugely delayed in reaching AGC and reached at around 06:30, consecutively, on 4th the train was only allowed to depart at 10:00 AM.
.
PS:If you've a flight to catch, I'd strongly suggest you NOT to opt this train.
Page#    1 Blog Entries  

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Fri Mar 10
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Wed Mar 15
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Thu Mar 30
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Wed Jun 28

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 (01:22PM)


    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 (09:53AM)


    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 (11:40AM)


    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 (11:05AM)


    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 2017 (12:25AM)


    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)


    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site