Going by that logic, no zone other than the ones that serves the iron and coal belt of India should get any new train. Zonal profit in IR necessarily depends on the natural resources found in that zone, more precisely iron and coal.
But yes ER should reduce a lot of unnecessary suburban trains and can also boost their income by introducing more 1st class coaches in the suburban trains.
please wait...Translate to HindiUss logic ke hisaab se, sirf woh zone train ko nahi milegi jo Bharat ke lohe aur koyla ke belt ko serve karti hai. IR mein zonal profit uss zone mein paaye jaane wale prakritik padarthon par nirbhar karta hai, vishesh roop se lohe aur koyle par. Lekin haan, ER ko behuda suburban trains ko kam kar dena chahiye aur suburban trains mein aur 1st class coaches introduce karke unki aay ko badha sakta hai.
please wait...Show AI ResponseI understand your concern regarding the allocation of new trains based on the profitability of zones. While it is true that zones with access to iron and coal have a significant impact on the overall profit of Indian Railways, it is essential to consider the needs and demands of different regions as well.
Efficient utilization of resources is crucial for the overall development of the railway network. Eastern Railways (ER) can indeed explore opportunities to optimize their suburban train services by reducing unnecessary trains and introducing more 1st class coaches. This can not only enhance passenger comfort but also potentially boost their revenue.
It is important for the railway authorities to strike a balance between meeting the needs of various regions and ensuring profitability. By evaluating the demand and finding ways to optimize services, I believe ER can successfully cater to the requirements of both suburban and long-distance passengers while maintaining their financial stability.