Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
  Full Site Search  
Sat Mar 24, 2018 12:33:46 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sat Mar 24, 2018 12:33:46 IST

Blog Entry# 1056638
Posted: Apr 13 2014 (22:46)

1 Responses
Last Response: Apr 13 2014 (22:46)
Rail News
Commentary/Human InterestINT/International  -  
Apr 13 2014 (21:40)   Network Rail fails to meet punctuality targets and faces a record £70m fine | Business | The Guardian

ICCWC2015   110 news posts
Entry# 1056638   News Entry# 173705         Tags   Past Edits
Network Rail has admitted it has failed to meet its punctuality targets, as it braces for a record fine of up to £70m.
The organisation that owns and operates Britain's railway infrastructure has fallen well short of its goal of 92.5% of services arriving "on time" – within five minutes of their scheduled time. It is expected to tell its regulators on Monday that at least one in 10 trains have been running late.
The Office for Rail Regulation can fine Network Rail a fixed amount for every 0.1 percentage point away from
its target. The Sunday Telegraph reports that Network Rail's punctuality is 89.9% – a figure Network Rail insiders described as "fairly accurate" – with one day's performance to go. Network Rail argues that the recent bad weather, and the growing popularity of rail services, made it harder to achieve the punctuality targets agreed five years ago.
"It's obviously disappointing not to get closer to the target," said a Network Rail spokeswoman, who said last winter's storms had been a significant factor. "It's clearly not the only reason we didn't hit the target. There are things we need to improve, including asset management and the network itself".
The ORR could reduce the fine if it concludes that there are extenuating circumstances for the poor performance. Last November, though, it rebuked Network Rail for a £1.2bn underspend on maintenance, saying this had led to infrastructure problems, causing many delays.
As well as recent flooding and storms, Network Rail also points to the increase in passenger numbers in recent years. That, it argues, means a problem with one train has a bigger knock-on impact than in 2009 when the targets were set. "The popularity of the railways puts more pressure on us as we try to run a punctual network," the spokeswoman explained.
The ORR reported earlier this month that it received 32 complaints per 100,000 journeys in the last three months of 2013, 14% less than a year ago. Time-keeping remains rail travellers' biggest gripe, with one in three complaints related to punctuality or reliability.
Network Rail insists it is taking steps to improve the network, with £38bn of investment scheduled for the next five years to increase capacity and relieve congestion.

Apr 13 2014 (22:46)
S V Iyer*^~   14913 blog posts   12366 correct pred (64% accurate)
Re# 1056638-1            Tags   Past Edits
Every zone in IR must be set such targets so that punctuality improves across our rail network and passengers will not be put to inconvenience.... But again punctuality shd be calculated as average delay between halts the train runs otherwise zonal will boost additional slack towards the last to avoid fines.....

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Tue Apr 3
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Sun Apr 8
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Mon Apr 23
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Sun Jul 22


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2547009
    Oct 16 2017 (10:21PM)

    As per the recent post , the new Pax Login feature has now been introduced. Here are the details of the feature set. . 1. Now you may login to the site as a Member or a Passenger, or BOTH Member & Passenger at the same time. Passenger login is called "Pax Login"...
  • Entry# 2517609
    Oct 11 2017 (09:33AM)

    As detailed here , last month, some changes were made to the PNR section. In the next phase of this rollout, we shall be further separating "Passengers" from "Members". . 1. "Passengers" will be able to login using ONLY their PNRs (no password). We shall have a Pax Login above the current...
  • Entry# 2418661
    Sep 25 2017 (07:09AM)

    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 2017 (11:46PM)

    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment", "bashing", etc. have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)

    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)

    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.