Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Sat Jul 22, 2017 02:26:07 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sat Jul 22, 2017 02:26:07 IST

Blog Entry# 1937920  
Posted: Jul 22 2016 (17:32)

1 Responses
Last Response: Jul 22 2016 (17:32)
Rail News
IR AffairsCR/Central  -  
Jul 22 2016 (14:48)   Retain reduce on Container Corp of India

For Better Managed Indian Railways~   948 news posts
Entry# 1937920   News Entry# 274482         Tags   Past Edits
The latest data from the government highlights that India’s rail container volumes fell by 7.5% y/y in June 2016 after having recovered in April (+4.0% y/y) and May (+5.9% y/y). Domestic volumes during June fell by 16% y/y, while EXIM volumes fell by 5% y/y. Volume growth in FY16 was down 5.4% as well. Overall volumes in Q 1FY17 were up only 0.7% y/y, of which domestic volumes (17% share) were down 18% y/y, while EXIM volumes were up 6% y/y.
Lead distance for the rail container segment fell 5% y/y to 964 km in Q 1FY17. EXIM lead distance was down 5% y/y to 876km, while domestic lead grew by 2% to 1397km. Lead distance for the EXIM business is now
down c20% from peak in Jan 2011. JNPT’s market share loss to Gujarat-based ports has been the primary reason for the weakness in EXIM lead distance. This is likely to be reflected in lower realisations for rail container players like CCRI
We continue to value CCRI using a DCF model and an unchanged WACC of 12.8%. CCRI is currently trading at a 25.5x Sept 2017e PE, while our TP implies an 18.9x PE. Our unchanged target price implies downside of c26% to the current price and we retain our ‘reduce’ rating on the stock. A faster-than-expected macro recovery and improved visibility on the Dedicated Freight Corridor’s completion timeline.

Jul 22 2016 (17:32)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 1937920-1            Tags   Past Edits
JNPT is already losing its market share to Gujrat ports, where as IRlys have unrealistically (?) expected a very bullish growth for JNPT and started the double lined Western Dedicate freight corridor from JNPT-Dadri (near Delhi). Shall the traffic in 2019 (when DFC is commissioned) from JNPT justify huge costs incurred in the DOUBLE LINE DFC?
It seems that with about similar investment, four single lined dedicated freight corridors could have been taken at the same time with provision for doubling when the freight traffic increase in next 5/10 or 15 years. SECR, ECoR, SER combined carries about 45% of total freight traffic of Indian Railways. Trunk lines of these zones (1500-2000 km length) which are carrying more freight traffic than routes
represented by the DFCs under construction, could have been served by DFC for better national interest (within same expenditure). This could have ensured better utilization/revenues of DFC and more benefit to Indian Economy.
We planned the DFCs in 2005-6 when Indian economy and world economy was in unprecedented boom. Expecting the same rate of growth in economy for very long, we had bullish predictions for growth in freight traffic for next 15 to 20 years on two routes (Delhi-JNPT, Delhi-Sonnagar-Kolkata) and directly planed to go for double line DFCs on both routes. In the process the routes which are already carrying much more freight traffic (SECR,ECoR,SER) than these routes are totally left behind. The economic boom has subsided during the planning and drawing stage, even before the construction of DFC started. After DFCs are complete, the traffic offered shall be much lesser than the quantum expected with nonstop economic boom. The new Double line DFC shall lie underutilized one hand, crying for more freight offering in order to survive financially. On the other hand the most overworked freight lines shall continue crying for relief from freight overburden they had been carrying since long. There will definitely be over capacity in some area and under capacity in other. National economy shall suffer by way of suboptimal logistics attained after huge investment.
A retired Rly Board member has very rightly said in one of his articles that decisions in IR are taken on gut feeling rather than scientific study of data & market surveys. Whatever suboptimal outcome achieved is then any how managed. IRlys could any get away with it, thanks to monopoly enjoyed.
Historically NDLS-HWH, NDLS-BCT, NDLS-MAS are no.1,2,3 routes of IR and they remain so today and probably so forever. For passenger traffic the above 3 are really top, but when it comes to freight they are not the toppers esp. Del-MAS. Here the leaders are the SECR, ECoR, SER trunklines. Had the freight been prime concern, the best option was to cover these freight zones also in the first phase of DFC by resorting to single line instead of double line. While planning for DFCs probably more emphasis was laid on releasing extra capacities, in order to facilitate more/ faster passenger trains on the 2 premier passenger routes, rather than to relieve the premier freight routes of the country. Also private investment for a new dedicated passenger train is difficult to come.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Tue Aug 1
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Sun Aug 6
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Mon Aug 21
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Sun Nov 19


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)

    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 2017 (09:53AM)

    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 2017 (11:40AM)

    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 2017 (11:05AM)

    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 2017 (12:25AM)

    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)

    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.