Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Sat Feb 24, 2018 23:34:40 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sat Feb 24, 2018 23:34:40 IST

Blog Entry# 1951406
Posted: Aug 04 2016 (10:00)

1 Responses
Last Response: Aug 04 2016 (10:00)
Rail News
IR Affairs
Aug 04 2016 (09:03)   Don’t merge rail and general Budgets

For Better Managed Indian Railways~   948 news posts
Entry# 1951406   News Entry# 275897         Tags   Past Edits
Doing so will reduce the Railways to just another government department, whereas it needs to be run along commercial lines
The merger of the Railway Budget with the General Budget is once again making a buzz. It is learnt that the Railways Minister has accepted the recommendations of the Bibek Debroy committee.
Agreed, a practice started 90 years ago should be reviewed. It may be relevant to recall the factors that led to the separation in 1925.
Railways were in bad shape at the turn of the last century. The 36,735-mile route was pulling in different directions. There were state lines worked by the state, state lines worked by guaranteed or independent companies, company lines worked by companies, and lines belonging to the princely states. The Railways failed to meet the demand from passengers as well as trade. The facilities were utterly inadequate. Goods rotted on the platforms as there were no wagons or locomotives to move them. Overcrowding and waiting for days at stations was quite common. The main reason for such a state of affairs was the non-availability of funds for expansion, development, and repairs and maintenance.
A question of funds
Even though the railway revenue formed a major portion of the government revenue, the Railways were starved of adequate funds. In times of bad harvest and trade, when the revenue fell, the budget allotment to the Railways was the first casualty.
The cut in expenditure was exercised even during the currency of the year resulting in suspension of works in progress and disbanding of staff. Late in the year if the financial situation improved, the finance member with equal suddenness encouraged the Railways to spend more, leaving them little time in which to do so. The system was further battered by World War 1, leading to a clamour from the public — as represented in the Imperial Legislative Council urged through repeated resolutions moved in 1914, 1915, 1917, and 1918 — for the appointment of a committee to enquire into the desirability of adopting direct state management of the Railways and emancipating the utility from the finance department of the government.
In November 1920, a ten-member (three Indians) committee was appointed with Sir William Acworth as chairman to “go into the whole question of railway policy, financial and administration”. The committee collected evidence and came to the conclusion that Indian Railways “cannot be modernised, improved and enlarged so as to give to India the service of which it is in crying need at the moment until the financial methods are radically reformed” and the essence of that reform according to the committee was complete separation of the Railway Budget from the General Budget and its reconstruction in a form “which frees a great commercial business from the trammels of a system which assumes that the concern goes out of business on each 31st of March and starts de novo on 1st of April”.
This, then, was the beginning of the separation. Speaking in the Assembly while presenting the Budget for 1924-25, the finance member of the council reminded members that “I know of no reform which offers greater benefits to our finances and Railways alike than a definite separation”. This would enable the Railways to spend money according to the real needs of the system unimpeded by the vagaries of the Budget figures and the requirements of the Budget accounting. The separation started with the Budget of 1925-26.
Populist exercise
The practice of paying dividend to the general revenues on the capital invested from there continues but the Railways since then have been responsible for earning and spending their own money. Of course they do have to look for budgetary support from the general exchequer as the money earned has never been enough to meet their needs. One reason for this has been their inability to raise fares and freight commensurate with the rising cost of transport.
This politicisation of the Railways came along with Independence and India embracing parliamentary democracy. As a result, the Railway Budget over the years has become more a populist than a commercial exercise. The autonomy envisaged was fettered by not raising passenger fares in line with rising costs. Indeed, passengers are being subsidised by goods traffic.
The Budget has also become an instrument in the hands of several railway ministers to build their vote-bank. All this affected the finances so that today, the Railways do not have adequate funds for expansion, development or replacement of worn-out tracks or rolling stock. Besides, there was the impact of Partition and World War 2.
During all these years of independence, though major landmarks were achieved, Indian Railways still lagged behind in expanding and modernising its network for want of adequate funds. In 1950, we had 54,600 km of track. To this we could add hardly 11,000 km in all these years. China had just 22,161 km in 1950. Today it has over 1 lakh km. Our Shatabadis and Rajdhanis and even the latest Gatiman Express run at a maximum speed of 160 kmph. China has already achieved a speed of 300 kmph with the Beijing-Guangzhou bullet train service.
It is not that our engineers are not capable of reaching those targets. It has always been the constraint of funds. Internal resources were never enough. The budgetary support from the general revenues was always limited. External borrowings through the Indian Railway Finance Corporation could is also restricted. So the emancipation envisaged in the separation of railway finances from general finances was, to a great extent, diluted by inherent flaws in our political system.
Parallel problems
While merging the budgets will remove this snag, it will also create parallel problems. The railway revenue will become part of the general revenue but so will the expenditure. In the event of shortfall in revenue or gross receipts in the general budget, will the finance ministry carry out the cuts in Railway expenditure? Certainly not.
There are some regular costs such as staff salaries, fuel, stores and equipment that cannot be guillotined. The sacrificial lamb could again be the modernisation and expansion. The constraint in raising passenger fares would be the same with the finance minister presenting the General Budget as with the railway minister presenting the Railway Budget.
The merger will only make the Railways become one more government department; it will lose its commercial character. There is also a contradiction in the approach of intellectuals who were engaged in studying the organisation. On the one hand, they talk of privatisation of the Railways and on the other, they suggest merging the entity fully into the system, subverting its commercial nature which requires separate treatment of its finances.
It would be better to leave the current nature and character alone and concentrate on strengthening, modernising and expanding the Railways so that it can meet the demands and challenges of transporting mind-boggling numbers of people and goods across the length and breadth of this country.
The writer was executive director of finance, Railway Board

Aug 04 2016 (10:00)
srinivasvasanthi~   4333 blog posts   15 correct pred (54% accurate)
Re# 1951406-1            Tags   Past Edits
Present systems of a separate Railway Budget presentation have to be ever continued.If the present Railway Minister does not want to present separaye Railway Budget in ParliamentSession , he may be shifted to some other Ministry.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Tue Mar 6
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Sun Mar 11
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Mon Mar 26
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Sun Jun 24


Rail News

  • सहरसा से प्रतिदिन 11 हजार यात्री कर रहे यात्रा  News Entry# 330264
    by: amishkumar~  Today (22:10)

    सहरसा। पूर्व मध्य रेल सहरसा से प्रतिदिनि यात्रा करनेवाले यात्रियों की संख्या 11 हजार तक पहुंच गई है। सहरसा से अन्य स्टेशनों सहित महानगरों के लिए औसतन प्रतिदिन 11 हजार से अधिक यात्री टिकट कटाते हैं। कोसी प्रमंडल मुख्यालय सहरसा होने की वजह से यहां से प्रतिदिन आम यात्रियों के अलावा...
  • यात्री हमारे भगवान हैं, उन्हीं के बदौलत चलती है रेल..  News Entry# 330263
    by: amishkumar~  Today (22:05)

    सहरसा। रेल यात्रियों से सौहार्दपूर्ण बातें करें। रेल यात्री हमारे भगवान हैं। उनकी बदौलत ही रेल चलती है। इसलिए उन्हें सुविधाएं उपलब्ध कराना हमारी पहली प्राथमिकता है। यात्रियों से किसी सूरत में कोई भी रेलकर्मी बहस न करें। रेल यात्रियों के साथ सकारात्मक रवैया अपनाएं। शनिवार को सहरसा स्टेशन स्थित प्रतीक्षालय...
  • मार्च में होगा सीआरएस का निरीक्षण: मुख्य अभियंता  News Entry# 330262
    by: amishkumar~  Today (22:01)

    सहरसा। पूर्व मध्य रेल के मुख्य अभियंता विद्युत राकेश तिवारी ने कहा कि मार्च 18 के पहले सप्ताह में सीआरएस को पत्र लिखकर रेल विद्युतीकरण कार्य का निरीक्षण करने के लिए अनुरोध किया जाएगा। मुख्य संरक्षा आयुक्त के निरीक्षण पश्चात ही इस रेलखंड में इलेक्ट्रिक इंजन का परिचालन शुरू होगा। उन्होंने...
  • Rs 1.5 crore for third line survey between Mughalsarai and Kiul  News Entry# 330261
    by: Meri 18626 super sabse uper~  Today (20:48)

    PATNA: The long-pending demand for a third rail line between Mughalsarai and Kiul via Buxar seems to have been considered by the Centre as Rs1.5 crore has been allocated in the Budget for 2017-2018 to assess its feasibility and submit a survey report to the railway ministry. Technical experts will submit...
  • रेलनगरी में अपराधियों के टारगेट पर रेलकर्मी  News Entry# 330260
    by: ❤️SUPERMAN❤️^~  Today (19:46)

    मुंगेर। रेल कारखना, इरिमी, एसीआरए और मॉडल स्टेशन के कारण जमालपुर का उप नाम रेलनगरी भी है । लेकिन रेलनगरी पर अपराधियों की काली नजर लग गई है । शुक्रवार को रेलकर्मी नंदन कुमार सहित रेलकर्मी के पुत्र राकेश कुमार ¨सह की हत्या के बाद सीन साफ हो गया है कि...

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2547009
    Oct 16 2017 (10:21PM)

    As per the recent post , the new Pax Login feature has now been introduced. Here are the details of the feature set. . 1. Now you may login to the site as a Member or a Passenger, or BOTH Member & Passenger at the same time. Passenger login is called "Pax Login"...
  • Entry# 2517609
    Oct 11 2017 (09:33AM)

    As detailed here , last month, some changes were made to the PNR section. In the next phase of this rollout, we shall be further separating "Passengers" from "Members". . 1. "Passengers" will be able to login using ONLY their PNRs (no password). We shall have a Pax Login above the current...
  • Entry# 2418661
    Sep 25 2017 (07:09AM)

    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 2017 (11:46PM)

    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment", "bashing", etc. have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)

    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)

    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.