Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Tue Sep 26, 2017 22:06:12 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Tue Sep 26, 2017 22:06:12 IST

Blog Entry# 1960600  
Posted: Aug 12 2016 (18:32)

1 Responses
Last Response: Aug 12 2016 (18:32)
Rail News
Commentary/Human InterestCR/Central  -  
Aug 12 2016 (18:08)   IRCTC asked to compensate man for wrong train schedule info

विश्व नाथ*   3552 news posts
Entry# 1960600   News Entry# 277017         Tags   Past Edits
A consumer court has directed the IRCTC to pay a compensation of Rs. 7,000 along with ticket and RTI costs to a Thane resident for his sufferings due to the rail corporation’s deficient service in giving wrong train schedule to him.Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC), is a subsidiary of the Indian Railways that handles the catering, tourism and its online ticketing operations.
Complainant Gopal Bankatlalji Bajaj, from Kamothe in Navi Mumbai, had booked his train ticket through the IRCTC portal for a reserved seat in Nagpur-Mumbai Express for travelling from Amravati to Mumbai on May 5, 2013.
made an online payment of Rs. 300, and he got the ticket with PNR number on his mobile via an SMS from IRCTC.
However, when he arrived at Amravati station at the specified time to board the train, which was scheduled to depart at 1940 hrs, he was informed that it was late by four-and-a-half hours.
As he had to reach his office the next day, he purchased a general ticket for Rs. 180. He then travelled the entire distance with extreme difficulty in general (unreserved) compartment of another train, the complainant stated before the Thane District consumer Redressal Forum.
He also informed the forum that the IRCTC had informed him in reply to an e-mail that the train was on time.
However, later the complainant sought the train running status vide an RTI query from the IRCTC headquarters in New Delhi, which informed him that the train was running behind its schedule on that day.
The IRCTC also refunded Rs. 300 which he paid for the first ticket that he had booked.
However, unhappy with wrong information being provided by IRCTC about train schedule, Bajaj also sought refund of the money he spent on the second ticket and also the RTI charges, besides the compensation for sufferings and legal expenses.
The forum relied on the fact that IRCTC refunded Rs. 300, which means there was a delay in running of the train, and also the RTI reply kept before it.
Thus, Forum president Sneha Mhatre, and members Madhuri Vishwarupe and N.D. Kadam recently ordered the IRCTC to pay the new ticket cost of Rs. 180, and also the Rs. 150 RTI cost along with 12 per cent interest from May 5, 2013, to the complainant, along with Rs. 5,000 towards mental his sufferings and Rs. 2,000 for his legal expenses.
The forum observed that in falsely informing that the train was running as per schedule, the IRCTC has given deficient services to the complainant.

Aug 12 2016 (18:32)
gopalfirst   81 blog posts
Re# 1960600-1            Tags   Past Edits
given RS7000 is good., but shame to IRCTC. and thanks to consumer court ., and thanks to RTI., and once again shame shame to IRCTC.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Fri Oct 6
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Wed Oct 11
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Thu Oct 26
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Wed Jan 24


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2418661
    Yesterday (07:09AM)

    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 (11:46PM)

    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment" have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are an integral...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)

    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)

    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 2017 (09:53AM)

    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 2017 (11:40AM)

    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.