Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:04:05 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:04:05 IST

Blog Entry# 2088869  
Posted: Dec 12 2016 (17:59)

5 Responses
Last Response: Dec 13 2016 (19:23)
Rail News
Other News
Dec 12 2016 (17:11)   Why should passengers bear railways safety cess?

Jayashree   37386 news posts
Entry# 2088869   News Entry# 288410         Tags   Past Edits
What a proposal! It is by none other than Prabhu. He is no longer rail-god if he proposes such terrible waifs and strays. The railways' safety measures are inadequate which ultimately bring accidents to our dismay.
But Prabhu does not mull over rectifying lapses strictly. He tries to find out a very odd way and majorly transfer the onus on the passengers by the probability of a hike in second class fare.
What an apt recourse to fill the disappointment arisen out of finance ministry’s funding rejection. Directly and dastardly he stimulated to
raise load on the poor passengers.
Although this proposed safety cess by the railways required as many as Rs 1.20 lqkh crores for bringing improvements in various safety measures including track consolidation, upgrading signal system, the man less crossing has been a matter totally of the railways' department yet it transfers onus on the general public.
In the absence of no other option since the finance ministry’s rejection of bail-out package, the railways has turned to the public. Opposing this proposed move a group of passengers maintained that this was one more anti-people step in the direction to get defeats at the ensuing assembly polls.
The finance ministry will make available 25% of the safety fund while the rest 75% will be procured by the railways. In this proposed procurement, the common man will have to be a victim through fare augmentation.
What is this BJP government aiming for? Already burdened with heavy fare the second class passengers are not in a position to bear this further hike as several passengers keep up that we are shelling out more fare in comparison to low facilities. It is us who realise the hellish journey by travelling in the second class compartment. Prabhu! Have your compassion upon us. Spare us from the burden of extra enhancement.
Instead of bringing perfection in its engineering department the railways seems to have been going on the pattern of that formula where girls are told to learn self-defence tactics at the spurt in molesting and rape cases. The main problem re is sidetracked by adding additional option.
Is it a safe stride for much-publicised better days or just another pace to compel the general passengers to leave travel by the trains and take knee-knocked feet’s assistance for covering the desired distance of the destination?
This proposal seemed a jolt enough to stumble down the second class railways passengers. It might be said that the deliberation on such kind of move, as a matter of fact, had been going on for quite earlier. Yet it is not like the demonetisation tiresome decision which might be forgotten in a few months. Its impact will always disturb the minds of the public. They have only heard it recently from the different sources.
Of course, this plan looked more like a sinister and sensational suggestion that might have been a claim to the put the finishing touch to the posturing towards fare enhancement. When the finance ministry rejected the proposal for special rail safety fund, the railways thought it saner to divert the burden of another cess on the humble passengers.
That is why it can be undeniably a compact with the devil and to a greater extent Prabhu’s effective documented attempt to come to a composition with his policy makers.
And now in the lurid glow of a sunset, the railways' minister takes on those saffron colours which have made him another name ridiculous and erratic after various accidents and deficiencies on the tracks he girds up his loins to show up with a fresh cess after the promulgation of the swacchata cess.

Dec 12 2016 (17:59)
Sanjay Dixit   16 blog posts
Re# 2088869-1            Tags   Past Edits
There is no sense in charging low fares and allowing people to be killed. Subsidy for lower class fares is very high - between 40% and 60%. It needs to be brought down for Railways to keep running, otherwise we will go the way of Pakistan Railway which runs barely 110 trains a day over its 8000 km network. Indian Railway runs 12000 plus trains over a network which is 8 times that of Pakistan but runs 110 times the number of trains.

Dec 12 2016 (18:08)
Venkat వెంకట్   3308 blog posts   1 correct pred (100% accurate)
Re# 2088869-2            Tags   Past Edits
Passenger trains fare increase will not create wealth to railways. Railways it self has many known mistakes, but never address them. Already AC prices in many routes are above Flight fare.
Railways should think about Automation and avoiding over head costs, if not if u double the fare from now also will not help.

Dec 12 2016 (19:45)
DhnEcr~   5515 blog posts
Re# 2088869-3            Tags   Past Edits
The unreserved fares are not high. Besides sunurban fares with Monhtly passes are very cheap indeed. While Upper classes ahve got regualrly hiked, these have remained stagnant. Charge more higher class argument wont help Railways economically as there is rapid mass switching to airlines. The majority of passengers section fares needs to be hiked.

Dec 12 2016 (20:05)
MCPNBR~   2166 blog posts   101 correct pred (88% accurate)
Re# 2088869-4            Tags   Past Edits
What is the use of spending more than air fares and to spend 24hours to 48 hours? Nobody will travel in those cases.

Dec 13 2016 (19:23)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 2088869-5            Tags   Past Edits
(1) Bigger and more comprehensive question is - "Why should Citizens & economy of India should bear the inefficiency of IR?"
(2) Major and decisive benefits of Railway operation over road:
Energy Efficiency-Friction and hence energy consumption between rail and wheel is just 1/6th compared to road and tyre.
Economies of scale- Capacity of a 24 coach train is 1500-2500 depending on the composition
of coach against 30-50 of a bus.
Capacity of a freight train is 5000T as against 15-25T of a truck.
The costing per seat or per berth with railway has to be much more cheaper than the bus.
(3) Following are the facts which are unacceptable:
(3a) Even after having highest freight fares in world, IR is struggling with more than 70% of its revenues going for Pay-Allowance-Pension and nothing left for modernisation, renewal, maintenance, loan repayment, etc.
(3b) IR continuously losing its market share to other inefficient modes of transport: Freight 90% to 30%, Passenger 75% to 15% since independence.
(3c) New frequently appearing news like that the non executive cadres are working at homes of officials rather than doing duty, maximum number of cases aginst IR is recieved at CVC,, IR still continuing with British Raj type costly facilities like saloons, Ectreme finincial imprudence decision making eg running trains at occupancy as low as 10% for months/ years, going for Mega projects without ensuring financial returns, political expediency, Departmentalism etc.
Above points give a clear indication that radical changes are a must for bright future of rail transport in India.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Sun Sep 3
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Fri Sep 8
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Sat Sep 23
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Fri Dec 22


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)

    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 2017 (09:53AM)

    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 2017 (11:40AM)

    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 2017 (11:05AM)

    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 2017 (12:25AM)

    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)

    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.