Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Tue Nov 21, 2017 21:01:03 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Tue Nov 21, 2017 21:01:03 IST

Blog Entry# 2367144
Posted: Jul 31 2017 (13:25)

1 Responses
Last Response: Jul 31 2017 (13:33)
  
General Travel
0 Followers
881 views
Jul 31 2017 (13:25)   NZB/Nizamabad Junction (3 PFs)

Guest: 6ccff392   show all posts
Entry# 2367144            Tags   Past Edits
Earlier before 10 years Kerala Superfast Express till 2007 Used to travel via this route Guduru-Chennai Central-Arakkonam-Katpadi ,But after that a demand from the public of Tirupati Pilgrims who are going to New Delhi asked for the diversion of this train Via Katpadi-Chittoor-Pakala-Tirupati-Renigunta-Guduru, and moreover Kerala Superfast Express is India's daily longest Running train.The reason is that Tirupati,Chittoor People don't have a daily direct train to NewDelhi.and already Chennai People have daily 2 trains to New Delhi.Tamilanadu Superfast Express and GrandTrunk(GT)Superfast Express and at that time Rajadhani Bi-Weekly Superfast was there and TN SamparkKranthi Via Chennai Egmore was also introduced in 2004 it was weekly at that time,but after sometime it was changed to Bi-Weekly and Thirukkural Superfast Via Chennai Egmore was also introduced in 2002 but at that it was weekly and now it was changed to Bi-weekly after the demand from the people of South Tamilanadu.Now...
more...
Even there is one more Bi-Weekly Superfast Express for the People of Chennai to go to NewDelhi that is Dehradun/Chandigarh-Madurai 12687/88.Earlier this is Dehradun/Chandigarh-Chennai and moreover it was weekly at that time,but after the demand from the people of Madurai,Dindigul and Karur this train was extended till Madurai from Chennai and made Bi-Weekly.
Then why can't Chennai-Mumbai LTT-Chennai Weekly Express 11074/73 diverted Via GDR-BZA-KZJT-PDPL-NZB-MMR-KYN? even this weekly train will not effect the people who are travelling to Mumbai in current route that is Via Renigunta-Cuddapah-Guntakal-Raichur-Wadi-Pune-Kaly an.If this train is diverted via this GDR-BZA-KZJT-PDPL-NZB-MMR-KYN route it will travel for extra 329kms the thing is that both routes are completely different and doesn't meet till Kalyan Junction from Chennai.but instead it will cater the needs of the intermediate station people like SPE,NYP,GDR,NLR,KVZ,SKM,OGL,CLX,BPP,NDO,TEL people to go to Mumbai.and this train will travel for more extra 5hours on this proposed route.and from MAS to PDPL it is fully double electrified route and it is known as GT Route and Now on some parts of MAS-PDPL GT Route Tripling works also have been started and the speed on this route is very high.As MAS-PDPL Section is fully busy with Rajadhani's,Duronto's,GareebRath's and Humsafar's.and moreover MAS-GDR-BZA section people don't have a single train to Mumbai.Then what's the problem in diverting this weekly train?
Even Hyderabad-Narasapur-Hyderabad Daily Express used to travel via SC-PGDP-KZJ-BZA section in it's early days ,immediately after some days it's route alignment chandged via SC-PGDP-NLDA-NDKD-GNT-BZA which is completely different route when compared to PGDP-KZJ-BZA route.Now this train has got a lot of demand from the people of delta areas.Then what's the problem in diverting or changing the Alignment of Narasapur-Nagarsol-Narasapur 17213/14 Express Via Kazipet Town-Peddapalli-Nizamabad instead of running it on fully packed Kazipet Jn-Secunderabad Jn-Nizamabad Jn.
One more Better Example is that Navajeevan Superfast Express Ahmedabad-Chennai Central-Ahmedabad 12656/55 is travelling an extra of 180kms Via GDR-TEL-BZA-DKJ-KZJT-PDPL-BPQ-MJRI-WR-BD-AK-BSL-JL -ST-AKV-BRC-ANND and this route is longer when compared to Ahmedabad-Chennai Central-Ahmedabad Bi-Weekly Express 19420/19 Via AJJ-RU-HX-YA-GY-GTL-RC-WADI-SUR-KWV-DD-PUNE-KJT-PN VL-ST-BRC-ADI.The above example clearly shows that even the Railways will consider distance as a major factor,but they will mainly concentrate on the passenger traffic on a particular route the train is travelling through and where the demand from the people of a particular route is very high and to cover intermediate station people by catering their needs.Even though the travel time of both these trains travelling on particular route is just 2 hours difference,even though the distance is 180kms long.
One more Example is that Konark Express 11019/20 Mumbai CST-Bhubaneshwar-Mumbai CST Daily Express Via KUR-BAM-VZM-VSKP-SLO-EE-BZA-DKJ-KZJ-SC-VKB-WADI-GR -SUR-KWV-DD-PUNE-KJT-KYN is travelling for more than 130 kms when compared to Mumbai LTT-Puri-Mumbai LTT Weekly Superfast Express 22865/66 Via CTC-RJGR-SBP-JSG-CPH-BSP-R-G-NGP-WR-BD-AK-BSL-JL-M MR-KYN.
If we observe both these trains and routes through which these trains are travelling through are completely different from BBS-KYN,both these routes doesn't match from Bhubaneshwar till Kalyan.The reason is that Konark Express one portion of the Odisha state and Puri Weekly Superfast Express covers the remaining portion of odisha state.So morethan half of the part of odisha state is connected to Mumbai with their state capital Bhubaneshwar in both the different routes.
Then what is the problem of diverting 11074/73 MAS-LTT-MAS Weekly Express Via GDR-BZA-KZJT-PDPL-NZB-NED-AWB-MMR-KYN,on considering the above examples as a major factor.Can't it be implemented on this weekly train?If so implemented and diverted a lot of South Coastal AP people along with North Telangana districts people get benefited through this train to go to Mumbai,Nagarsol,Aurangabad,Nanded,Nasik Road and Viceversa.

  
866 views
Jul 31 2017 (13:33)
Sudeesh~   2037 blog posts
Re# 2367144-1            Tags   Past Edits
One small correction 12626/25 never touches MAS it used to run via RU, AJJ byepass, KPD route before electrification of RU TPTY CTO KPD route.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Fri Dec 1
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Wed Dec 6
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Thu Dec 21
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Wed Mar 21

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2547009
    Oct 16 2017 (10:21PM)


    As per the recent post , the new Pax Login feature has now been introduced. Here are the details of the feature set. . 1. Now you may login to the site as a Member or a Passenger, or BOTH Member & Passenger at the same time. Passenger login is called "Pax Login"...
  • Entry# 2517609
    Oct 11 2017 (09:33AM)


    As detailed here , last month, some changes were made to the PNR section. In the next phase of this rollout, we shall be further separating "Passengers" from "Members". . 1. "Passengers" will be able to login using ONLY their PNRs (no password). We shall have a Pax Login above the current...
  • Entry# 2418661
    Sep 25 2017 (07:09AM)


    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 2017 (11:46PM)


    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment", "bashing", etc. have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)


    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)


    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.