Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Tue Sep 26, 2017 23:49:46 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Tue Sep 26, 2017 23:49:46 IST

Blog Entry# 2376462  
Posted: Aug 10 2017 (21:05)

10 Responses
Last Response: Sep 23 2017 (21:24)
  
General Travel
0 Followers
1669 views
Aug 10 2017 (21:05)   12007/Chennai Central - Mysuru Shatabdi Express

ghi   565 blog posts
Entry# 2376462            Tags   Past Edits
List of maximum. permissible speed (km/h).The potential speed permitted by the permanent way structures may be even higher. Max permissible speed by RDSO may be more than original max permissible speed and less than potential speed permitted by the permanent way structures. RDSO speeds are indicated for some routes but all RDSO certified speeds for a certain route are not indicated but it is tried to include atleast highest ever certified speed by RDSO for the respective route and some others including it in some cases. If RDSO certified speed is written – it is clearly indicated that it is RDSO certified because it may not be same as actual max permissible speed. Lower speed in curves, bridges, elevation or short part & speed restrictions are not indicated for max permissible speed & RDSO certified speed though they will be applicable. A train can’t achieve max. permissible speed of a...
more...
route if it does not satisfy conditions for max. permissible speed of respective route. SIMRAN was seen around 2012.
New Delhi -Ghaziabad: mainly 105, slightly more in a part or some parts but not more than 110 is confirmed by SIMRAN (105 by RDSO in February 2008, August 2008, 110 by RDSO in April 2012).
Ghaziabad- Kanpur:130 (140 by RDSO, August 2008)
Kanpur Lucknow : mainly 105, slightly more in a part or some parts but not more than 110 is confirmed by SIMRAN.(By RDSO: i) 110: 30.3.94, 25.11.94 of Dn line, 8.6.95 amendment, amendment 31.5.96 ii) 105: August 2008)
Kanpur - Howrah via Grand chord or Dhanbad, Bardhaman chord or Dankuni except Gurpa Gaghandi: 130 (130 by RDSO)
Gurpa Gaghandi (a part of Gaya Koderma): most of the parts: about 65 in some parts by SIMRAN, other parts unknown (130 by RDSO)
Sealdah Dankuni: unknown but nowhere more than 110 by SIMRAN
Moradabad Lucknow: at least some parts 105 and nowhere more than 110 by SIMRAN
Lucknow Sultanpur Varanasi: at least some parts 110 by SIMRAN
Mughalsarai Patna Hathidah (near Mokama) Sitarampur Jn (near Asansol): 110 confirmed by SIMRAN (certified by RDSO for 120 in 1993 with a request for giving attention for some parts. Upto RJPB : 110 by RDSO in April 2012)
Times of India Mar 15, 2015, 10.35 PM IST
Patna: Danapur division of East Central Railway (ECR) has submitted a proposal to its Hajipur headquarters to increase the speed limit of trains up to 130 kmph between Patna and Mughalsarai. At present, trains run at 110 kmph on the Jhajha-Patna-Mughalsarai route.
Times of India: Jan 20, 2014, 04.26 AM IST PATNA: Railways has decided to increase the speed limit to 130kmph on the mainline route on Jhajha-Mughalsarai section under Danapur division of East Central Railway (ECR). Work is going on in full swing to strengthen tracks on this particular route. At present the speed limit is 110kmph on this route for Rajdhani Express, mail and express trains.
Hathidah (near Mokama) Guwahati/ Dibrugarh Town: Barsoi to New Jalpaiguri is mostprobably 100, New Jalpaiguri to Guwahati is mostprobably 100 or 105 or varies between 100 & 105 or something between 100 & 105 by SIMRAN (certified for other than c&M1 Vol I in Hathidah Guwahati/ Dibrugarh Town by RDSO is 105)
Nagda Mathura: 130 (140 by RDSO, August 2010)
Nagda Ratlam: 130 (130 by RDSO)
Ratlam Limkheda (a part of Ratlam Godhra): 100 (130 by RDSO 8.4.16)
Godhra Limkhera (Limkheda?) Godhra: : mostprobably 110. earlier 100 was confirmed by SIMRAN (120 by RDSO, October 2005 with a request for giving attention for some parts. 100 by RDSO, April 2007) (130 by RDSO 8.4.16) 110 by RDSO 2.11.16
Godhra Vadodora Virar: 130 (130 by RDSO 8.4.16)
Virar Mumbai Central - BORIVALI: 100 (100 by RDSO)
Borivali – Virar 100 or 110 (110 by RDSO 2.11.16)
12951 / 12952 New Delhi – Mumbai Central Rajdhani Express, 12953 /12954 A. K. Rajdhani Express, 12009 / 12010 Ahmedabad – Mumbai Central Shatabdi Express will run at 130 kmph o¬n Virar - Godhra & Virar – Ahmedabad sections from 120 kmph, due to improvement in infrastructure. (W R website)
Vadodora Ahmedabad: 110 (130 by RDSO 8.4.16)
Ahmedabad Godhra: actual is unknown. (130 by RDSO in July 2008, August 2008)

5 posts - Tue Aug 15, 2017

  
960 views
Aug 15 2017 (20:30)
Aditya*^~   4683 blog posts   2417 correct pred (70% accurate)
Re# 2376462-6            Tags   Past Edits
increased around 2015. you can check videos taken by members in that section.although TT of any Rajdhani is not changed. on 13th August 12314 covered Gaya - Dhanbad section in 2hr 6 minutes

  
808 views
Aug 23 2017 (21:21)
ghi   565 blog posts
Re# 2376462-7            Tags   Past Edits
IGATPURI – KASARA: SPEED: MAIL/EXPRESS TRAINS = 55 (60) KMPH Source (Maybe wrong): Central Railway / Division At Glance/ Indian Railways Portal CMS Team Last Reviewed on: 26-02-2011
KASARA - KALYAN: Speed: MAIL EXPRESS= 105 KMPH, PASSENGER TRAIN = 105 KMPH. Source (Maybe wrong): Central Railway / Division At Glance/ Indian Railways Portal CMS Team Last Reviewed on: 26-02-2011
Section: MYA-NHY, Existing Speed: 90 Proposed Speed: 100. Remarks: Sent to HQ’s on 03.11.16. Source (may be wrong): SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY website: BANGALORE DIVISION: CIVIL ENGINEERING BRANCH: South Western Railway CMS
...
more...
Team Last Reviewed on: 21-12-2016.
Section: MYA-NHY, Existing Speed: 90 Proposed Speed: 100. Remarks: Sent to HQ’s on 03.11.16. Source (may be wrong): SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY website: BANGALORE DIVISION: CIVIL ENGINEERING BRANCH: South Western Railway CMS Team Last Reviewed on: 21-12-2016.
Section: Naganahalli-Mysore (BG New Double line) Present Speed. 70 (kmph) Proposed speed 100 (kmph) Status and TDC: Sanction under process at Hqrs. TDC – 31.7.2016. Maybe wrong
List of maximum. permissible speed (km/h).The potential speed permitted by the permanent way structures may be even higher. Max permissible speed by RDSO may be more than original max permissible speed and less than potential speed permitted by the permanent way structures. RDSO speeds are indicated for some routes but all RDSO certified speeds for a certain route are not indicated but it is tried to include atleast highest ever certified speed by RDSO for the respective route and some others including it in some cases. If RDSO certified speed is written – it is clearly indicated that it is RDSO certified because it may not be same as actual max permissible speed. Lower speed in curves, bridges, elevation or short part & speed restrictions are not indicated for max permissible speed & RDSO certified speed though they will be applicable. A train can’t achieve max. permissible speed of a route if it does not satisfy conditions for max. permissible speed of respective route. SIMRAN was seen around 2012.
LNL – KJT descending the ghat section: unknown (60 by RDSO 4.4.13)

  
674 views
Aug 26 2017 (20:34)
ghi   565 blog posts
Re# 2376462-8            Tags   Past Edits
Maximum Permissible Speed:
VN – JTJ 100 to 110 target in 2011-12
IGU-CBE 70 to 90 target in 2011-12
SRR- MAQ: 100 to 110 target in 2011-12 (done)
MAQ – TOK: 65 (time is
...
more...
guessed by seeing some of other parts of the document, the time was2011)
ERS – ALLP: 90 (time is guessed by seeing some of other parts of the document, the time was2011)
SRR – ERS: 80 (time is guessed by seeing some of other parts of the document, the time was2011)
ALLP – KYJ: 90 (time is guessed by seeing some of other parts of the document, the time was2011)
Source (may be wrong): Raising of Maximum Permissible Speed by searching in Southern railway website
Maybe VANIYAMBADI [VN], IRUGUR [IGU], KAYANKULAM [KYJ]

  
660 views
Aug 26 2017 (20:37)
ghi   565 blog posts
Re# 2376462-9            Tags   Past Edits
Route ... Major Section... MPS (kmph) UP.. MPS (kmph) DN
A ......... TATA-JSG .......... 110 ................ 110
Source (maybe wrong): South Eastern Railway CMS Team Last Reviewed on: 24-04-2015 got in (maybe wrong)
: South Eastern Railway website -> sectional speed by using search

  
151 views
Sep 23 2017 (21:24)
ghi   565 blog posts
Re# 2376462-10            Tags   Past Edits
SECTIONAL SPEED:
Bhadrak – Palasa 110
Source (Maybe wrong): ECR website -> ENGINEERING No date of these data but other info of 2016-17 was in the source

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Fri Oct 6
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Wed Oct 11
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Thu Oct 26
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Wed Jan 24

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2418661
    Yesterday (07:09AM)


    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 (11:46PM)


    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment" have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are an integral...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)


    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)


    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 2017 (09:53AM)


    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 2017 (11:40AM)


    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.