Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Wed Sep 27, 2017 01:42:28 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Wed Sep 27, 2017 01:42:28 IST

Blog Entry# 2376592  
Posted: Aug 10 2017 (22:55)

4 Responses
Last Response: Aug 12 2017 (09:52)
Rail News
Other News
Aug 10 2017 (21:03)   Parliamentary panel moots rethink on defining Railways as ‘commercial undertaking’

Jayashree ❖ Amita*^   37807 news posts
Entry# 2376592   News Entry# 311331         Tags   Past Edits
The Centre should not consider the Indian Railways as a commercial undertaking and should find ways to fund ‘socially desirable projects’ that yield a return of less than 12 per cent, a parliamentary panel has said.
The Standing Committee on Railways noted in its report that of the 432 new-line, gauge-conversion and doubling projects, two-thirds (292) have a rate of return of less than 12 per cent, adding that 222 of them have a negative rate of return.
The panel now wants the government to assess the quantum of social service obligations, and
has asked the Railway Ministry to take a re-look at defining the Railways as a ‘commercial undertaking’. The Committee has contended that much like defence and roadways, the Railways also makes an indirect contribution to overall GDP, besides also fetching direct earnings.
“...the concept (of the Railways being a commercial undertaking) was alright as long as it was under the British regime. Whatever penny the Britishers invested, they wanted returns out of it,” the report said.
The Committee has also asked the government to come up with viable plans to fund ‘socially desirable projects’ in a phased manner so as to address issues in perspective, remove hindrances and work as a pro-active facilitator of connectivity.
The Railways, the report said, could only fund these projects through gross budgetary support (GBS) and through outside credit whereby the Railways have to pay market rate, because the return from these lines would not be substantial enough to reimburse the cost of borrowing.
The Committee was apprised that, while the Railways had not yet received a response from the Finance Ministry, steps had been initiated in this regard by merging the Rail Budget with the General Budget. According to the Railways, the total net social service obligation on coaching and freight services was at Rs 34,000 crore in FY16.
However, the Railways have prioritised some projects as national projects which is on its ‘top priority’ list. This list includes some in Jammu and Kashmir and the North-East.
As on date, the Railways have 495 ongoing, pending projects worth Rs 4.36-lakh crore, which can never be completed if the public sector behemoth were to proceed with the present mode of funding, the panel report noted.

Aug 10 2017 (22:55)
srinivasvasanthi~   4050 blog posts   15 correct pred (54% accurate)
Re# 2376592-1            Tags   Past Edits
Indian Railway s are built-up over the common man Indians properties during the British era.
Now we can imagine the lands controlled by our IR in all the Metros / cities / Towns and Rural areas and its present market values.
The present Railway Board members have to be gone back to the British era .How the British acquired the lands from the common &poor man and evacuated them .
So our IR has social obligations for the Indian poor and common peoples.
They have to be served enough ordinary passenger trains and sub urban services .
Nowadays land acquisition for Railway projects are very much tedious.Railway projects are delayed for the decades .
.Example.Chennai MRTS last stretch of Velacherry to St .Thomas Mount lands acquaintance are delayed by 3 decades and still pending .
So many Railway projects are not at all surveyed through the public lands.

Aug 11 2017 (15:00)
a2z~   2045 blog posts
Re# 2376592-2            Tags   Past Edits
* Tragedy for IRlys since independence is, most of the new lines constructed were "socially desirable projects" rather than to genuinely required projects. Result is deterioration of Rly finances.
* Any such project forced on the IR, should be accompanied with compensation clause to save IR from the cost of construction, as well as future operational losses incurred when the socially desirable project is commissioned.
* New rail line is often sanctioned to connect home towns/ inlaws-town/ political constituency of big shots, a case of connecting home town with in laws town
of big politicians etc. Mostly the political interests are served in the name of so called "socially desirable projects". Most of the "socially desirable projects" had been implemented in some states only, with an intention to serve the RM's or party's political interests rather than to serve the society at large.

Aug 11 2017 (18:59)
srinivasvasanthi~   4050 blog posts   15 correct pred (54% accurate)
Re# 2376592-3            Tags   Past Edits
RM s daughters Medical college Town stoppages etc.Any how other people also benefitted

Aug 12 2017 (09:52)
a2z~   2045 blog posts
Re# 2376592-4            Tags   Past Edits
But what abt the injustice to the residents of many other towns which are more deserving ones for such stoppages

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Sat Oct 7
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Thu Oct 12
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Fri Oct 27
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Thu Jan 25


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2418661
    Sep 25 (07:09AM)

    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 (11:46PM)

    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment" have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are an integral...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)

    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)

    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 2017 (09:53AM)

    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 2017 (11:40AM)

    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.