Forum Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Full Site Search
Sun Mar 18, 2018 15:48:13 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sun Mar 18, 2018 15:48:13 IST

Blog Entry# 2958842
Posted: Jan 01 2018 (15:26)

12 Responses
Last Response: Jan 03 2018 (11:29)
★★  General Travel
Jan 01 2018 (15:26)   12026/Secunderabad - Pune Shatabdi Express | BMT/Begumpet (2 PFs)

❤ WAP7 ❤~   6794 blog posts   843 correct pred (67% accurate)
Entry# 2958842            Tags   Past Edits
Anubhuti coaches in 12026... Spotted today...

5 posts - Mon Jan 01, 2018

2 posts - Tue Jan 02, 2018

Jan 02 2018 (11:22)
Saurabh®~   4601 blog posts   46 correct pred (70% accurate)
Re# 2958842-8            Tags   Past Edits
no body is crying foul here . you are keeping your view here and i am keeping mine. that's it. and do respect that whether you agree or not.,
waise bhi dekha jaye to iri ke adhe polls who will gett lhb first/eloco first/favourite station/zone/train sab useless hai
and discrimination automatically comes into a system when there is politics.
going by your logic
even grading of stations like a1,a b is discriminatory as pax of every station pay same fare then why one gets more facilities and one does not.
two days ago even MFp was thrown out of a1 category going by the newly announced system. ye system railway ne hi banaya hai humne nahi

Jan 02 2018 (11:33)
Darth Vader~   1321 blog posts   7 correct pred (33% accurate)
Re# 2958842-9            Tags   Past Edits
Dude 😂😂, there's a difference between Stations and Trains
Now if Railways starts adding Station Development Surcharge on persons entering the said stations, obviously I'll apply my logic there too but it isn't happening yet according to my knowledge.
Now Railways is charging Dynamic Fare and quite excessive normal fare for these trains of "SAME CLASS", remember "SAME CLASS", obviously I'll demand same facilities, not a Single doubt about it.
speaking just compare the cost required to develop a train vs the cost required to develop a station. You'll know what's achievable in real time and what isn't.
And OBVIOUSLY Stations of same class MUST have same facilities.
But here for the sake of discussion our purview was limited to Shatabdi trains, hence my logic ☺

Jan 02 2018 (11:42)
Saurabh®~   4601 blog posts   46 correct pred (70% accurate)
Re# 2958842-10            Tags   Past Edits
same class ki trains me bhi pehle se hi bahut partiality hai . kuch duronto abhi haal tak icf rake me chal rahi thi. lkuch duro abhi bhi h -lhb se chal rahi hai.ludhiana shatabdi abhi bhi icf me chal rahi hai. kuch sf trains lhbfied hoke top priority pe chal rahi hai aur kuch ram bharose.
discrimination to railway ke nas nas me shuru se hi hai

Jan 02 2018 (13:08)
Darth Vader~   1321 blog posts   7 correct pred (33% accurate)
Re# 2958842-11            Tags   Past Edits
"discrimination to railway ke nas nas me shuru se hi hai"
Agreed but why are you discriminating here ? Why are you promoting this crap policy ? It can be expected from a Political Institution like Railways but not from a Railfan like you.
I say this AGAIN FOR THE LAST TIME "Facilities in trains of 'Same Class' should be same regardless of patronage as patronage is temporary but class is permanent. Whether it's Duronto, Shatabdi, Rajdhani or any other class." Patience is all that's needed, Railways want to gain revenue from Anubhuti
Coaches they'll definitely add it in all Shatabdi trains or atleast try adding it.
Patience Bro Patience.
I like to promote development but not at the cost of others. Even So Called Backbencher Shatabdi's are Shatabdi's.

Jan 03 2018 (11:29)
Saurabh®~   4601 blog posts   46 correct pred (70% accurate)
Re# 2958842-12            Tags   Past Edits
theoretically , very correct and beautiful.but its very hard to implement this. tell , if you are a drm and receive only 1 set of lhb rake and there are 3 equal contenders with same requirement of coaches who will you give and on what formula will you give to any of them

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Wed Mar 28
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Mon Apr 2
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Tue Apr 17
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Mon Jul 16


Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2547009
    Oct 16 2017 (10:21PM)

    As per the recent post , the new Pax Login feature has now been introduced. Here are the details of the feature set. . 1. Now you may login to the site as a Member or a Passenger, or BOTH Member & Passenger at the same time. Passenger login is called "Pax Login"...
  • Entry# 2517609
    Oct 11 2017 (09:33AM)

    As detailed here , last month, some changes were made to the PNR section. In the next phase of this rollout, we shall be further separating "Passengers" from "Members". . 1. "Passengers" will be able to login using ONLY their PNRs (no password). We shall have a Pax Login above the current...
  • Entry# 2418661
    Sep 25 2017 (07:09AM)

    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 2017 (11:46PM)

    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment", "bashing", etc. have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)

    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)

    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.