In my opinion railways should make future train sets with this coach composition 6 general class coaches including luggage loading capacity , 6 sleeper coaches , 8 ac class coaches ( which can include third ac or second ac or first ac or can be a mixture of these coaches ) and ( either 1 ac coach or 2 ac coaches can be removed to add pantry car coach and extra luggage coach ) so 6+6+8 total 20 and 2 electric locos ( 1 at front side of whole trainset and 1 at back side of the whole trainset ) so 20 +2 total 22 coaches , so that instead of giving lhb rakes to some trains which runs on a longer path railways should directly convert those mail or express or superfast express trains into these trains sets and cost of making lhb coaches will also be reduced or...
more... saved due to directly conversion of mail or express train into train sets and rake reversal time of many trains will be reduced and cost of doing rake reversal of a train will also be reduced ( due to 2 locomotives - 1 at back side of the trainset and 1 and front side of the train set ) and speed of all trains can be increased easily and rapidly (due to 2 locomotives - 1 at back side of the trainset and 1 and front side of the train set ) . Please give your opinion on this but please don't give any argument related to politics so that my post don't get archived.
Or either railways can apply this coach composition in in some upcoming amrit bharat express trains so that we can see that whether this coach composition for train sets will become a successful idea or will become a flop idea.
please wait...Translate to EnglishIn my opinion, railways should build future train sets with this coach composition: 6 general class coaches (with luggage capacity), 6 sleeper coaches, 8 AC class coaches (a mix of 3rd AC, 2nd AC, and 1st AC is possible), and either 1 or 2 AC coaches can be removed to add a pantry car and an extra luggage coach. This totals 20 coaches, plus 2 electric locomotives (one at the front and one at the rear) for a total of 22 coaches. Instead of assigning LHB rakes to longer routes, railways should directly convert mail, express, or superfast express trains into these train sets. This will reduce the cost of LHB coach production, decrease rake reversal time and costs (due to the two locomotives), and allow for easier and faster speed increases.
Alternatively, railways could apply this coach composition to some upcoming Amrit Bharat Express trains to test its feasibility.
please wait...Translate to HindiMere khayal mein, railways ko aage ki train sets aise banani chahiye: 6 general class coaches (luggage loading ki jagah ke saath), 6 sleeper coaches, 8 AC class coaches (jinmein third AC, second AC, first AC, ya inka koi mix ho sakta hai), aur ya toh 1 AC coach ya 2 AC coaches hata kar ek pantry car aur ek extra luggage coach lagaya ja sakta hai. Total 6 6 8 = 20 coaches, plus 2 electric locos (ek aage aur ek peeche), total 22 coaches. Isse LHB rakes kuch trains ko dene ki bajaye, jo lamba rasta chalti hain, un mail/express/superfast trains ko seedha in train sets mein convert kiya ja sakta hai. LHB coaches banane ka kharcha bhi kam hoga, rake reversal ka samay aur kharcha bhi kam hoga (2 locomotives ki wajah se), aur trains ki speed aasani se badh sakti hai.
Ya fir railways yeh coach composition kuch upcoming Amrit Bharat Express trains mein laga kar dekh sakti hai ki yeh idea successful hoga ya nahi.