SCR Proposed for the permanent diversion of VSKP LTT Via GNT if So. the train exactly run with a difference of 5-10min behind Sabari express(17229) what about Sabari express then..? the train is already slowed after SRR by-pass if this VSKP LTT Joins the line the train will be slowed even more.
what's the point of diverting a train in a fully saturated line. The 18520 will have additional block B/W SC GNT of Approx 1hr 30min. in order to save 30km and a LR the train is now creating another headache in the entire stretch.
...
more...
will turn into Visakha express 2.0 B/W VSKP-SC
1. Quota Will be effected
2. Crawler of the stretch
3. Will be slowed by approx 2hrs towards VSKP
4. Effects other trains TT.
instead of re-routing this train why cant they ask for the frequency of COA-LTT which is already running.
brainless proposals.
already the train Degraded from SF to M/E. Now after re-routing this will now turns into a Fast Passenger
please wait...Translate to EnglishSCR proposes to permanently divert the VSKP LTT via GNT. If so, the train will run exactly 5-10 minutes behind the Sabari Express (17229). What about the Sabari Express then? The train is already slowed after the SRR bypass. If this VSKP LTT joins the line, the train will be slowed even more.
What is the point of diverting a train on a fully saturated line? The 18520 will have an additional block between SC GNT of approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes. In order to save 30km and a LR, the train is now creating another headache in the entire stretch.
It will turn into Visakha Express 2.0 between VSKP-SC.
1. Quota will be affected.
2. Crawler of the stretch.
3. Will be slowed by approximately 2 hours towards VSKP.
4. Affects other trains TT.
Instead of rerouting this train, why can't they ask for the frequency of the COA-LTT, which is already running?
Brainless proposals.
Already the train was degraded from SF to M/E. Now, after rerouting, this will turn into a Fast Passenger.