Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Sun Jan 21, 2018 12:57:03 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sun Jan 21, 2018 12:57:03 IST
PostPostPost Trn TipPost Trn TipPost Stn TipPost Stn TipAdvanced Search
Filters:

Blog Posts by reachsubrata
Page#    2 Blog Entries  
  
Predictions: 30
confirm: 30
rac: 0
wl: 0
Journey: Fri Jul 11, 2014
Departure: HWH/Howrah Junction @ 12:45 PF#: 9
Arrival: NDLS/New Delhi @ 06:25 +1 night PF#: 10
Distance: 1451 km / 1451 km
Travel Time: 17h 40m  4 halts
Class: AC 1st Class - 1A   |   Tot Seats: Avbl 8   |   Charting: < 08:45
12273/Howrah - New Delhi Duronto Express
PNR: 672-xxxxxxx   |   Similar PNRs
Entry# 1151305
 
Posted Status as of: Jun 30 2014 (20:27)
Passenger 1: Waitlist# 1 (Booking Status: W/L 4,GNWL)
Passenger 2: Waitlist# 2 (Booking Status: W/L 5,GNWL)
Chart NOT Prepared

Please analyze this PNR, and predict the final Charting Status. Thanks.

Latest Status as of: Jul 11 2014 (11:44)
Passenger 1: Can/Mod (Booking Status: W/L 4,GNWL)
Passenger 2: Can/Mod (Booking Status: W/L 5,GNWL)
Chart PREPARED

  
1289 views
Jul 05 2014 (11:32)
reachsubrata   9 blog posts   1 correct pred (100% accurate)
Re# 1151305-1            Tags   Past Edits
Thanks for your prediction. Hope the other ticket will also be confirmed and that we two Senior citizensare not alloted two upper berths and in different coupes.
  
General Travel
0 Followers
1276 views
Apr 29 2014 (12:17)  
 

reachsubrata   9 blog posts   1 correct pred (100% accurate)
Entry# 1075987            Tags   Past Edits
For WL PNR tkts, often it appears with two numbers, i.e. GNWL#/WL#, for example GNWL12/WL5. It is suggested more clarity should be made avilable as to whether GNWL nos. 1-7, have been confirmed or not?

8 posts - Tue Apr 29, 2014

  
463 views
Apr 29 2014 (16:44)
reachsubrata   9 blog posts   1 correct pred (100% accurate)
Re# 1075987-9            Tags   Past Edits
Thanks for your response.

  
536 views
Apr 29 2014 (17:22)
venky 63~   832 blog posts   65 correct pred (59% accurate)
Re# 1075987-10            Tags   Past Edits
first number in original status of wailtlist for that ntrain /class and second number wil 5 id current waitlist number . 12-5 , is 7 person have eitehr moved to racor confm or cancled , any of the optin, it need not be 1`,2, 3, up to 7 , it can be PAX 1, 4, 5 , 6 7 , 10 ,11 or any order

  
606 views
May 02 2014 (12:17)
reachsubrata   9 blog posts   1 correct pred (100% accurate)
Re# 1075987-11            Tags   Past Edits
When I booked my tkt ,my PNR No. 6626003985, indicated,Passenger 1cnf and 3 WL as WL 1,2,& 3.Presently it indicates, two Confirmed AC I berths and WL 2and 3, out of the 4 tkts booked under the same PNR, based on your response, it should have be confirmed, as WL 1, which was mine has already been cnfd. as indicated above. However, it still indicates in the site, on PNR Query as WL 1 and 2. Pl let me know why the status updation as CNF, is not being reflected when the presenr status of WL is WL 13 /WL 6. Shall appreciate a clear cnf status note.

  
560 views
May 02 2014 (12:18)
Guest: 7fedbd7f   show all posts
Re# 1075987-12            Tags   Past Edits
plz edit your post and remove PNR number from here

  
478 views
May 02 2014 (13:00)
reachsubrata   9 blog posts   1 correct pred (100% accurate)
Re# 1075987-13            Tags   Past Edits
Out of 4 PAX bkd under one PNR, it reflected PAX 1 as CNF & others as WL 1,2and3. Subsequently PAX 2 got Cnfd and other 2 PAX was being shown as WL1& 2. Presently, WL status is WL6/WL13. However PNR Query still reflects WL 1 and 2 under my above reffered PNR. Shall appreciate a claer cnf status being reflected in PNR query status. Class of travel is AC 1.
Page#    2 Blog Entries  

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Wed Jan 31
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Mon Feb 5
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Tue Feb 20
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Mon May 21

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2547009
    Oct 16 2017 (10:21PM)


    As per the recent post , the new Pax Login feature has now been introduced. Here are the details of the feature set. . 1. Now you may login to the site as a Member or a Passenger, or BOTH Member & Passenger at the same time. Passenger login is called "Pax Login"...
  • Entry# 2517609
    Oct 11 2017 (09:33AM)


    As detailed here , last month, some changes were made to the PNR section. In the next phase of this rollout, we shall be further separating "Passengers" from "Members". . 1. "Passengers" will be able to login using ONLY their PNRs (no password). We shall have a Pax Login above the current...
  • Entry# 2418661
    Sep 25 2017 (07:09AM)


    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 2017 (11:46PM)


    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment", "bashing", etc. have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)


    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)


    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.