PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 Bookmarks
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt
News Super Search
 ↓ 
×
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Category:
Zone:
Language:
IR Press Release:

Search
  Go  

WAP-7 - दिल तुझपे कुर्बान

Full Site Search
  Full Site Search  
 
Mon Nov 30 16:52:04 IST
Home
Trains
ΣChains
Atlas
PNR
Forum
Topics
Gallery
News
FAQ
Trips/Spottings
Login
Advanced Search
<<prev entry    next entry>>
News Entry# 423089
Oct 29 (18:41) Approved by US, rejected by WHO — science of remdesivir & why it has turned controversial (theprint.in)
*covid-19
0 Followers
442 views

News Entry# 423089  Blog Entry# 4761957   
  Past Edits
This is a new feature showing past edits to this News Post.
The controversy around remdesivir use stems from divergent claims about its efficacy among patients, and appears to centre on the stage at which it should be administered to patients.

New Delhi: It began life as an antiviral drug for Hepatitis C and Ebola and was also tested for SARS and MERS, but it was only when the Covid-19 pandemic swept the world that remdesivir truly became a household name.
...
more...

In June, the drug became a part of the Covid-19 management protocol issued by the Union Health Ministry as an investigational therapy for moderate cases (those on oxygen), and it continues to be used widely among patients. It was part of the treatment extended to US President Donald Trump after he was diagnosed with Covid-19 late last month.

However, there have been questions regarding its use since July, when the Ministry of Health began a review of remdesivir amid reports of its adverse effects, especially on the liver, among patients. 

The confusion intensified this month as interim results from the WHO’s Solidarity Trial — which is aimed at zeroing in on an effective Covid treatment — said remdesivir and three other drugs “appeared to have little or no effect on hospitalised Covid-19 patients, as indicated by overall mortality, initiation of ventilation and duration of hospital stay”. 

Just a week later, the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved remdesivir for use among coronavirus patients subject to certain conditions, making it the first treatment for Covid-19 to receive the watchdog’s approval. 

The controversy around the use of remdesivir stems from divergent claims about its efficacy among patients, and appears to centre on the stage at which it should be administered to patients.

ThePrint explains the science of remdesivir, and why there are different assessments about its efficacy.

Also Read: Busting Covid myths on plasma therapy and remdesivir, and what India’s falling numbers mean

How does remdesivir work

A virus is not strictly a living organism. It cannot replicate unless it has entered a host cell. Once it does, the virus uses the genetic material of the host cell to make multiple copies of itself and then goes on to invade other cells, repeating the process till the “viral load” is high enough for the body to start showing symptoms of the infection. 

When remdesivir enters a cell, it mimics some of the viral material that is used to make copies of the virus, thus disrupting the copying process. This can, however, only work when the virus is still new to the body and has not made enough copies of itself to invade multiple sites in the body. It won’t work if the body’s immune system has started becoming hyperactive because of the viral load.

The clinical management protocol for Covid-19 issued by the Ministry of Health says remdesivir should not be used if a patient displays signs of liver damage, has severe renal impairment, is pregnant or lactating, and less than 12 years old. 

Even Gilead, in its safety summary about the drug, mentions the possibility of elevated liver enzymes in patients taking the drug.

Also Read: Here’s what research says about Remdesivir, drug given to Covid-hit Donald Trump

The controversy

On 15 October, a preprint on the interim results of the WHO’s Solidarity trial — meant to study the impact of four drugs on mortality from Covid-19 — said remdesivir and three other drugs “appeared to have little or no effect on hospitalised Covid-19 patients, as indicated by overall mortality, initiation of ventilation and duration of hospital stay”.  

Gilead Sciences, the American firm that first manufactured the drug, hotly contested the findings, pointing out in a statement that the study was not peer-reviewed, and that there is “more robust evidence from multiple randomised, controlled studies published in peer-reviewed journals validating the clinical benefit of Veklury® (remdesivir)”.

“The benefits of Veklury have been demonstrated in three randomised, controlled clinical trials, including a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (ACTT-1) — the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy and safety of investigational drugs. The results from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)’s ACTT-1 trial, which was conducted primarily in the United States and Europe, found that treatment with Veklury resulted in clinically meaningful improvements across multiple outcome assessments in hospitalised Covid-19 patients,” Gilead said.

The NIAID study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine this month. It concluded that remdesivir is superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults who were hospitalised with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection.

On 22 October, the US Food & Drug Administration approved remdesivir for use among Covid patients subject to certain conditions. The approval of Veklury, the FDA said, was supported by the agency’s analysis of data from three randomised, controlled clinical trials that included patients hospitalised with mild-to-severe Covid-19.

The drug was already in use in the US under emergency use authorisation. 

When India first included remdesivir in the Covid management protocol, its use was suggested for moderate patients who are on oxygen.

Dr S. Chatterjee, consultant medicine at Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, said he has seen patients with mild and moderate disease improve with the drug. “The drug does not seem to work in really severe patients. But the unfortunate thing is, without a trial, there is no way of ascertaining whether it (recovery) was because of the drug or not. In a viral disease, quite a few patients improve on their own,” he added. 

“In mild or moderate disease, when the patient is on oxygen, we used remdesivir with several other medicines including steroids and anti-clotting agents. It is difficult to say which of these medicines work. There is also the theoretical possibility that the patient would have got better anyway without any medicine. In a private setup when we are pushed to the wall, we use it, often the families insist,” he said.

Microbiologist Dr Gagandeep Kang, currently attached to Christian Medical College Vellore, said in a tweet on 24 October that the failure of remdesivir “to prevent mortality in the Solidarity trial” does not mean it does “not work at all to treat illness or progression to severe disease”.

Important. Remdesivir was shown not to prevent mortality in the Solidarity trial. Does this mean that remdesivir does not work at all to treat illness or progression to severe disease? It does not, since that is not what Solidarity was set up to measure.

— G Kang (@GKangInd) October 24, 2020



“If an antiviral works well to suppress replication of the virus when given early after infection, it may well not work when given at a later stage because symptoms, severity and consequent mortality may be because of host response,” she added.

Also Read: Researchers smell a rat, say expensive remdesivir getting ‘subtle push’ over HCQ in studies

 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

80% Covid patients in a Spanish hospital were Vitamin D deficient, study finds

Doctors of NDMC-run hospitals call off strike after pending salaries released

Angela Merkel plans to impose partial lockdown in Germany as Covid cases surge

Most Popular

Nikita Tomar’s family says Tauseef was harassing her for long, they lodged complaint in 2018

China to release first Pakistani film in almost 40 years amid tensions with India

Not a ‘cure’ for Covid but Patanjali’s Coronil kit & drugs are a big hit, 85 lakh units sold
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Mobile site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy