News Super Search
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
IR Press Release:

Full Site Search
Sat Jan 20, 2018 07:32:26 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sat Jan 20, 2018 07:32:26 IST
Advanced Search
Trains in the News    Stations in the News   
<<prev entry    next entry>>
News Entry# 289185
Dec 20 2016 (16:20)  Arun Jaitley hints Railway fare hike, says passengers should pay for services (
back to top
Other News

News Entry# 289185   Blog Entry# 2097585     
   Past Edits
This is a new feature showing past edits to this News Post.
Arun Jaitley hints Railway fare hike, says passengers should pay for services
Ahead of the combined general and railway budget, Arun Jaitley on Tuesday gave hint that there could be hike in passengers fare.
New Delhi, Dec 20: Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley will present the first combined general and railway budget soon. Ahead of the combined general and railway budget, Arun Jaitley on Tuesday gave hint that there could be hike in passengers fare. Arun Jaitley rejected the idea of several subsidies populist announcements regarding trains. The Finance Minister said clearly that passengers must
pay for the service they receive and emphasised on outsourcing of non-core functions like hospitality services in railways. Speaking at National Conference on Accounting Reforms in Indian Railways,
Arun Jaitley signalled that the Union government will resist populist measures, concentrate on infrastructure of railway stations and make passengers to pay for the facilities. Jaitley said the success of the railway budget should not have been measured by subsidising consumers and making populist announcements regarding trains. “The first essential principles of running any establishment, particularly a commercial establishment, are that the consumer must pay for the services that they receive,” said Arun Jaitley. “Railways got caught in a battle where populism prevailed over performance,” the Finance Minister added. Jaitley cited the examples of power sector companies and highways sector which suffered huge losses  as consumers were not paying for services until sector reforms. “Therefore, world over only those services have succeeded where the financial model is — consumers must pay for services they receive. We turned this whole theory upside down by self-imposed indiscipline that populism requires consumers do not pay for the services they receive,” Arun Jaitley said. The Finance Minister said the Prime Minister Narendra Modi led government has done away with populist announcements especially related to new train. The government had in September scrapped the 92-year old practice of presenting a separate railway budget and decided to present a combined general and railway budget for 2017-18 on February 1, 2017. “Your accounting systems really must reveal more instead of concealing the reality. What is the kind of investment in infrastructure that is coming in, what is the kind of investment in railway safety, what is the kind of outcome of outlay that you have planned, I think those accounts must really reflect the reality,” Jaitley said. Rail minister Suresh Prabhu raised neither the passenger fares nor freight rates in his second Rail Budget tabled in the Parliament in February this year. The statement of Arun Jaitley that ‘passengers must pay for the services’ signalled there could be hike in passengers fare in the first combined general and railway budget.

Dec 20 2016 (17:52)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 2097585-1            Tags   Past Edits
A very thought provoking info.
FM (super RM?) says, "passengers must pay for the service availed"- but which passengers, only the targeted ones (ACII,ACIII,ACC, sometimes SL) or all the paxs?
Further it is told that power sector and highway sector has been reformed and customers who were earlier not paying for the services are now paying for the services availed.
Should we expect
Politicians, Rly employees, senior citizens, etc to pay full fare as they pay electricity fares/ busfares/ taxi fares?
Should we expect stoppage of concession showered by past RMs to garner votes/ appreciation?
Why it is expected that paxs should pay for inefficiencies of IR?
Reform in power and highways had been possible by liberation of the sectors i.e. breaking the shackles of state monopoly in the sectors by introducing competition in the fields and large scale involvement of Pvt sector.
Atleast IR can be made a PSU and sign a MOU with GOI regarding the achievement of targets of performance parameters, so that there is a strong commitment to improve and achieve better performance/profits and reduction in political interference.
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom

Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.