Boss why you are very keen to extend Uzhavan. It is made for Thanjavur and only starting express train from TJ. Being a head qurters of the district it needs direct train. So please do not ask for the extension of uzhavan to tvr. Instead you can request for mannai diversion via tvr.
So that TJ KMU people will request for another tpj-ms via mv ont which will fulfill the need of ml people more than enough.

---

It doesn't have loco change @ vm. End to end tnp alco's are used.

---

Boss we will allow this to happen. But think of the connectivity. If mannai diverted we have only uzhavan. In dont consider boatmail in which tj is in pq. Even in mannai tj is in pq but we uses nmj gn quota and board @tj. Demand is there for two trains. So divering one train means they have to compensate with other tpj-ms via mv. Then they can very well divert mannai.

---

Its great that you are really worried about general public who waits @nmj.
But for this reason they should not skip major stations getting benefits out of it. If you are really concerned about people waits at NMJ lc, request for a new line diverge from mq-nmj line well before nmj station limit and joins near tvr-nmj line towards tj. So this problem would be fixed and no need of fly over bridge and diversion if mannai.

---

Relation between vm-cgl doubling and ml new trains exists. If they should introduce new train between tpj and ms via mv vm-cgl doubling work should be comoleted. Mannai can be diverted only if new train has been introduced. So it indirectly has connection. You got my point?

---