| Entry#: | |
| HashTag: | |
| Member: | |
| Posting Date Range: | |
| Train: | |
| Station: | |
| Search Phrase: | |
RailMark Mode | Timeline UpdatesTrip UpdatesNews PostsPvt PostsAdmin PostsFollowed PostsChat RequestsBlog PostsPNR Posts | |||||||
| ||||||||
Post a Comment/Question/Picture/VideoPost a Comment/Question/Picture/Video Super Search Topics: **new Filters: | Rail News
New Trains
Site Announcements
Active MembersActive IRCTC Ticket Agents
Admin Blog LinksRail Websites by our Admins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blog Entry# 417185 Posted: May 05 2012 (7:30PM) 15 Responses Last Response: May 05 2012 (8:34PM) Respected members: Can anyone please get me which train it was that got WL 900+ confirmed a few days back (maybe a week or so ago). I forgot to bookmark it for reference. Anyone has info on it, please do the needful, Sir. 5 posts - Sat May 05, 2012 - are hidden. Click to open. but that particular PNR was running a WL of 900+ or even 1000+ as you have referred to Sir. The WL position in the aforementioned entry is less than 100 and its not greatly surprising. in fact we all deliberated on that PNR for some time That was for a short journey as well. And the train was Pushpak/ Howrah mail ?? And yes W/L 900+ did get confirmed. Let me try super search. Here it is /blog/post/397835 May 05 2012 (7:56PM) ↑⇑ ↓⇓ ←→ RLF レール人生永遠に zzz in NDLS** 11627 blog posts 2445 correct pred (83% accurate) ![]() wow yes got it Yes, exactly Maheshji. Thanx. RDB Sir. Here it is 12809. Its 875+, not 100 odd W/L...and that too for the end-to-end journey of 39 hrs. Yes, Yes, agree, Sir. That was a shocker and super shocker is this 12809 and then this Jhelum as well. These are all unusual occurrences and wondering what might be the pattern. I understand if it for short journeys but not this 39-hour end-to-end journey. I cant believe this. Sorry, didnt notice that 875, missed the middle 7, LOL. Well, it sometimes happens to me @ office. Another one.. /pnr/post/282609 |