Disclaimer   
Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Sun Mar 26, 2017 05:14:05 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sun Mar 26, 2017 05:14:05 IST

Blog Entry# 2067421  
Posted: Nov 21 2016 (23:14)

2 Responses
Last Response: Nov 22 2016 (21:36)
  
Poll
0 Followers
1222 views
20 votes
Nov 21 2016 (23:14)  

Proud atheist~   4088 blog posts   37 correct pred (63% accurate)
Entry# 2067421            Tags   Past Edits
Who should be held responsible for the Pukhrayan train derailment??
Railway minister0%0
Responsible DRM5%1
Loco pilot5%1
Train maintenance staff60%12
Controllers30%6
CRS0%0
some one else0%0

  
940 views
Nov 22 2016 (00:46)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 2067421-1            Tags   Past Edits
Fixing responsibility of such a accident is serious a serious activity. It can never be fixed before reading and analysing the final report of the expert committee formed to probe into the accident. If the question is who is the most probable culprit it is possible to give an answer.
Prima facie, the officer who ignored the report of the driver and did not bothered to get the train inspected even at Orai where the train had a 5 minute scheduled stop (between the accident spot and Jhansi), and instead preferred to sleep comfortably at night and asked the LP to go ahead (at full speed) till Kanpur (200kms away) appears to be main culprit.
Negligence
...
more...
of the TTE by way of ignoring the complaints made by S1 paxs regarding very loud and unusual noises is just appalling.
Had TTE got the coach checked at Jhansi or the concerned IR official bothered to get the train inspected at Orai and instructed to go ahead at lower safe speed, the accident would not have happened.If the expert committee report too have similar findings and no other hidden things underlie the incidence, then the official is culprit.
One thing which is typical in IR, is the fact that many top officials appear to believe in dictatorship rather than teamwork. When a top official visit a RS, special cleansing etc is done for appeasement much like a politicians visit. Top official shall inspect and dress down the subordinates and direct to get so & so done (without giving adequate resources) and media shall report the same in newspapers! Saloon type facilities, subordinates working at homes as reported are reminiscent of British Raj and does not gel well with today's management practices. It appears that taking a cue from politicians, senior officials too have started to govern IR rather than managing it on scientific principles.
Options like RM is extremely ridiculous, the steps taken by the RM towards safety is unparalleled since last 2 decades. His job is to make policies and allocate funds for safety of IR. This job has been done in a very good manner. He is one of the most efficient, dynamic, honest and the least politically expedient amongst the lot of RMs. If an accident is caused by negligence of IR official, how one can ask for the head of RM? He has laid enormous emphasis on safety and increased the allocations for safety related works like track renewals, electronic interlocking of stations,eliminating Level crossings(ROB/RUB) etc from previous levels of 3000-4000 crore Rs to a whopping 7500 crore Rs., refrained from introducing too many trains to the extent possible, sped up the capacity augmentation projects like doubling/tripling, new line with a direct result of commissioning 7-8 km of new track per day against the average of 4 km per day of last few years, has already been achieved. Targets for next years is to double it to whopping 18-19 kms per day!!. The congestion of tracks is the single biggest reason of accidents & present RM has done a great job in removing the congestion through huge allocations for capacity augmentation projects, but the benefits shall come to IR only after these huge projects start getting commissioned after a couple of years. Had he been RM for last 10 years with free hand to pursue his growth and development oriented policies, the IR would have been something else today.

  
922 views
Nov 22 2016 (21:36)
samarka95~   660 blog posts   166 correct pred (84% accurate)
Re# 2067421-2            Tags   Past Edits
In all probability and according to news reports there were faulty wheels and wheel clattering in atleast one of the coaches which translates to poor maintenance by WR ...maybe that wheel got jammed and slipped off the tracks and other coaches followed..there is evidence as the LP said to jhs controllers of increased load (due to jamming) but they said to take the train to CNB...maybe they dont have wheel changing facility there...the RM nd DRM should take the moral responsibility that it cannot convince its staff to work with full dedication which led to poor maintenance leading to the accident

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Wed Apr 5
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Mon Apr 10
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Tue Apr 25
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Mon Jul 24

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)


    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 2017 (09:53AM)


    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 2017 (11:40AM)


    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 2017 (11:05AM)


    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 2017 (12:25AM)


    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)


    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site