Disclaimer   
Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Tue Feb 21, 2017 13:38:23 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Tue Feb 21, 2017 13:38:23 IST

Blog Entry# 2069138  
Posted: Nov 23 2016 (19:18)

1 Responses
Last Response: Nov 23 2016 (20:09)
  
General Travel
0 Followers
3647 views
Nov 23 2016 (19:18)   12656/Navjeevan SF Express (PT)

phaniraj1274~   80 blog posts
Entry# 2069138            Tags   Past Edits
i dont know why this train is not having halt in peddapalli district head quarter.suppose if you take in ap state this superfast express has many haltings like sullurpeta,kavali,bapatla,chirala and in telangana mahaboobabad all these stations are equal to peddapalli station only.they are not big stations.but why those stations are given stoppage and not why our peddapalli,what mistake this station done.so let us come to the stoppages of this train in both a.p and telangana state
firstly in a.p state:-
in nellore district:-sullurpeta,gudur junction,nellore district head quarter,kavali
in
...
more...
prakasham district:-ongole district head quarter and chirala
in guntur district:-bapatla and tenali junction
in krishna district:-vijayawada junction
telangana state:-
in khammam district:-khammam district head quarter
in mahabubabad district:-mahaboobabad district head quarter
in warangal district:-warangal district head quarter
in mancherial district:-mancherial district head quarter
in komaram bheem asifabad district:-sirpur kagaznagar
so in telangana state and ap state whatever the stations this train pass through and what ever the districts it pass through every district head quarter in a.p and telangana has halt for this train ,except peddapalli junction district head quarter station what wrong peddapalli done.peddapalli is more revenue based station when compared to mahabubabad and sirpur kagaznagar but no halt here.
from peddapalli station there is no direct train to ahmedabad,surat,vadodara,rajkot cities.and even this navajeevan super express also don't have stoppage at this station.if you provide this daily super express halt at peddapalli.it will be beneficial for siricilla district weavers who want to sell their handlooms at surat ,ahmedabad and even from jagtial also so many people will be going to surat to purchase handlooms and from karimnagar and pdpl districts there are lots of marwadi people and it people working in ahmedabad.so please consider this factor and provide halt for this daily navajeevan express train at peddapalli.and moreover this train dont have stoppage at ramgundam,so providing stoppage at peddapalli is not a big task and moreover peddapalli is going to become a full pledged junction connecting nizamabad with in 2months.then what's wrong in providing stoppage at peddapalli junction
karimnagar district,jagtial district and siricilla districts for all these 3 district people pdpl station is very convenient and nearer as compared to kzj/wl and rdm stations in getting the train easily.
from krmr-pdpl by bus 38kms,from jgtl-pdpl by bus it is 60kms via dharmaram and from srcl-pdpl it is 78kms,
so if you take warangal from wl-krmr by bus it is 75kms.and wl-jagtial 125kms and wl-siricilla 115kms.and from krmr-rdm it is 60kms so rdm and wl are not convenient and nearer when compared with peddapalli town railway station.
so if you provide the halting for this navajeevan 12655/56 adi-mas-adi super express stoppage at pdpl so jagtial,siricilla and karimnagar people will directly get the train at peddapalli instead of going to warangal or mancherial stations.
so please think this and provide halting for this super express train at peddapalli and forward the proposal of providing halt to railway officials

  
3627 views
Nov 23 2016 (20:09)
Tickets booked for Rajasthan trip in june 2017   390 blog posts   1586 correct pred (90% accurate)
Re# 2069138-1            Tags   Past Edits
Sir,this is not a tip instead it is a suggestion or a demand . If you want members to discuss this issue then post it in main forum. And as you are referring it to any IR official, then as you might be knowing that this is not official site so nobody can help you here in this matter. Better would be you lodge your grievance/ suggesstion on pgportal or twitter. That is the medium to interact with IR officialy. Thank you.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Fri Mar 3
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Wed Mar 8
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Thu Mar 23
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Wed Jun 21

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 (09:53AM)


    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 (11:40AM)


    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 (11:05AM)


    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 (12:25AM)


    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)


    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
  • Entry# 2133126
    Jan 20 2017 (01:29AM)


    The modification to the TL Update scheme - i.e. the introduction of the new RAC System - has led to some efficiency with TL Updates. More TLs are being discussed, and quickly moved up. However, we still have on Average, about 300 Waitlisted TLs in the backlog at any time, and our hard-working and diligent TLMs...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site