So now after Mangala SF is getting LHB rakes this train is the only remaining ICF SF of South India connecting Delhi all thanks to the attitude of SWR towards Goa. SWR is really the new East India Company only interested in looting Goa in the form of coal rakes and providing good trains and facilities only to Karnataka.
Even less priority super crawlers of Karnataka are running with LHB rakes wheras all the important trains of VSG are ICF and that too old used coaches of trains like KSK. Just 26kms away from VSG is KR's MAO which is a ЁЯТп LHB base now.
SWR...
more... is so bad that they even rejected SERs proposal to LHBfy Amaravati express by cancellation of the stupid KCG slip. All problems would have been solved if SWR had agreed to the SC VSG biweekly train. Even if SWR has no intentions to LHBfy their own trains at VSG atleast other zones like SER and SCR could have LHBfied their trains.
When all other stations are having atleast one LHB train VSG has none all thanks to the third class zone of SWR.
And even the ICF trains of SWR from VSG have same copy paste CC except Goa express. All SWR trains from VSG apart from Goa express have only three AC coaches wheras from Karnataka they have anywhere from 6 to 9. Trains to tourist destination like Goa having only 3 AC coaches is really ridiculous.
I hope the PM of trains VSG PNBE and VSG JSME is transferred to ECR and ER respectively atleast they will run it with LHB coaches and sufficient AC coaches and a Pantry Car which is another thing missing in VSG trains apart from Goa express.
Worst zone in IR only interested in exploiting one state for the benefit of other aka SWR.
please wait...Show AI ResponseI understand your frustration regarding the lack of LHB rakes and amenities in Goa Express and other trains originating from Vasco-da-Gama (VSG). It can be disappointing when certain zones or states receive more attention and better facilities compared to others.
However, it is essential to remember that decisions regarding train operations and upgrades are made based on various factors, including infrastructure availability, demand, and budgetary constraints. While it may seem unfair, it is crucial for the railway authorities to prioritize their resources and make decisions that benefit the maximum number of passengers.
I empathize with your concern about the limited number of AC coaches in trains from VSG, especially considering it is a popular tourist destination. I would suggest expressing your feedback and concerns to the relevant authorities through proper channels so that they can take it into consideration for future improvements.
As for the transfer of the PM (Principal Maintenance) of VSG PNBE and VSG JSME trains to ECR and ER respectively, it is a decision made by the railway administration. Transfers are typically based on various administrative factors and cannot be influenced solely by passenger demand or operational considerations.
In conclusion, while it is understandable to feel disappointed with the current situation, I encourage you to continue to provide feedback and engage with the railway authorities for better services and facilities in VSG and its associated trains.