Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Sun Jun 25, 2017 07:51:28 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Sun Jun 25, 2017 07:51:28 IST

Blog Entry# 2091184  
Posted: Dec 14 2016 (23:33)

5 Responses
Last Response: Dec 17 2016 (13:05)
  
Imaginary
0 Followers
601 views
08
Dec 14 2016 (23:33)   IMG10346/♥♥Mumbai Dudhsagar Express♥♥ | CSTM/Mumbai Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (18 PFs)

Yash Railographer~   3 img trains   2 popular
18 green flags   0 red flags   6 green per Train
Entry# 2091184            Tags   Past Edits
Flags Please !!

  
427 views
Dec 15 2016 (17:06)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 2091184-1            Tags   Past Edits
Dear friend a very unusual route has been chosen for the Mum-UBL train. The unfortunate part is that this train need a timeslot in the Londa-MAO section which is extremely difficult, as new trains had been denied on the section since several years due to non availability of path.
Even if we assume that the path has been created by suitable capacity augmentation measures, or the planned doubling project is completed, why not to extend the train to Bengaluru and ensure a good patronage to the proposed 24 coach daily train?

  
362 views
Dec 16 2016 (19:05)
Yash Railographer~   540 blog posts   430 correct pred (71% accurate)
Re# 2091184-2            Tags   Past Edits
Thanks for your info. I agree with you. But I have my viewpoints too.
1) I don't understand why SWR is denying trains on MAO-LD section. Only one daily train, one quadra-weekly and others weekly trains. So less amount of trains. Add to this the freight trains. But still I don't think so one train will be a big issue. Konkan railway being a single line operates more than 70 trains (I don't know exact figure) daily, why cant SWR? Even existing trains are not allowed to run with 24 coaches. Railways must think about passengers and generating good income from them
2)
...
more...
I have organised this train as a tourist train towards Dudhsagar, and also for Konkan/Goa tourists. The primary reason to run this train ends at Castle rock itself. But this train should have a destination which could serve as a good terminus. That's why I chose UBL. If we extend it to SBC/YPR it will be used by Bangalore people and the very purpose of the train might destroy. The Udyan Express and some other trains passing via Vasai/Kalyan are doing their job.
3) We are railfans. Whatever we talk about changes, railways doesn't seem to bother :P So basically check the Dudhsagar chains created by me which are practical at current scenario.
P.S. They are just my viewpoints. Sorry if u feel hurt, I don't mean anything wrong about you

  
316 views
Dec 16 2016 (20:04)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 2091184-3            Tags   Past Edits
(1) There is nothing to get hurt friend, it were just my views. Earlier I read in a news paper that IR has discouraged the old practice of tourists using railway track (or trains stopping at spot or something like that) for seeing Doodh sagar falls due to safety and operational reasons.
(2) I appreciate your feelings for the spot & I too would like my train to stop at that spot so as to enable the prolonged viewing/ clicking snaps of the scenic beauty of the spot.
(3) One reason
...
more...
for poor sectional capacity may be due to the fact that the gauge conversion of Londa-Goa section was done hurriedly by the then RM/Govt, probably without considering the necessity of realignment at critical sections which is normally done during the GC of hilly/ghat sections. This might have resulted in poor sectional capacity of the converted section. There were allegations of corruptions that tender was not awarded as per guidelines and some sort of favouritism was done.
(4) KR has been constructed at standards equivalent or higher than the Golden quadrilateral routes of IR (160kmph) which have resulted in higher costs and Mr. E Sreedharan was very particular about it. Hence the first 150-179 kmph trial was done on KR route.

  
261 views
Dec 17 2016 (00:22)
Yash Railographer~   540 blog posts   430 correct pred (71% accurate)
Re# 2091184-4            Tags   Past Edits
1)In terms of safety, i think it is the responsibilty of people to take care of their own lines. Dont know whether i ll be allowed to visit dudhsagar by train due to this.
2)Corruption ruins everythings.
3)KR is definitely superior in terms of planning, construction and maintainence. (because it was constructed by a private corporation and not by Indian railways)
Even if I
...
more...
don't know you much, seeing your answers, it seems that you are a true railfan, with in-depth info and think practically. The things you conveyed to me made me think about current scenario. Thanks :) i don't know why you aren't on the admin list by now.

  
240 views
Dec 17 2016 (13:05)
For Better Managed Indian Railways~   1933 blog posts
Re# 2091184-5            Tags   Past Edits
Thanks for the comments bro.

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Wed Jul 5
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Mon Jul 10
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Tue Jul 25
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Mon Oct 23

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)


    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
  • Entry# 2165159
    Feb 15 2017 (09:53AM)


    A minor update, but may impact many members: Hereafter, FMs will be able to delete invalid Red Flags on Imaginary trains. Red Flags can be removed by FMs, only against specific complaints filed against the blog. This does not give all members the right to complain against EVERY single red flag they...
  • Entry# 2155798
    Feb 08 2017 (11:40AM)


    -@all members: As of recently, there has been a trend whereby minor name updates of Trains/Stations - whether such and such regional name should be there or not, whether the train should be called "Abc Express" or "Abc Superfast Express", etc. are threatening to take over the majority of Timeline entries. Also,...
  • Entry# 2147631
    Feb 01 2017 (11:05AM)


    A new experimental feature is being introduced called BotD - "Blog of the Day". The rules are: . 1. Replies are not eligible - only the Top Blog. 2. ONLY Blogs posted today (the day of the vote) are eligible. 3. Every member has ONE vote. In the course of the day, you may keep...
  • Entry# 2136570
    Jan 23 2017 (12:25AM)


    Several new features have been introduced recently to the Forum, and we are forever striving to make Member experience here more productive and satisfying. With the recent introduction and success of the new FM System, it has been observed that small groups of highly involved and enthusiastic members are far more...
  • Entry# 2134907
    Jan 21 2017 (02:46PM)


    It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.