 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Post PNR | Post Blog | Advanced Search |
Description/Uses/Merits of this ΣChain This weekend chain connects the Mukkadal town or the tip of the country, CAPE, with the holy Pinda Dhaan towns of Gaya, Varanasi, and the Triveni Sangam Allahabad. | 8189/Σ Mukkadal-Triveni Sangam Weekend Chain ΣChainCreated: Sep 03 2012 (15:45) by maheshsunda~
|
| ||||||
ΣChain Blog
Page# Showing 1 to 5 of 1932 blog entries next>>
Jun 13 (10:32) 12801/Purushottam Express (PT) | PURI/Puri (8 PFs)
PrakharYadav^~
PrakharYadav^~ 13136 blog posts
Sub: - Renumbering of ECOR owned trains in new time table effective from 01.07.2024
Ref: - CPTM/ECOR COIS message no. 253 /ECoR/PCOM/CHG/PTT/15/24dated 11.06.2024.
No.1-TT/Change in WTT/2023-24. Vide reference to (1) above, East Coast Railway has notified to revise the following train numbers with effect new time table which will come into effect from 01.07.2024. The details are
as...
more...
Ref: - CPTM/ECOR COIS message no. 253 /ECoR/PCOM/CHG/PTT/15/24dated 11.06.2024.
No.1-TT/Change in WTT/2023-24. Vide reference to (1) above, East Coast Railway has notified to revise the following train numbers with effect new time table which will come into effect from 01.07.2024. The details are
as...
more...
12801 is highest revenue generating train. Runs fully jampacked throughout the year. Now if railway does this, railway will only face the loss in revenue. And someone tell me, why 12875 is not de-graded instead of 12801. Even 12875 TT is slower, already having too much halts in central UP due to which its Avg speed is too slow to qualify as SF. Even its priority is too poor having SF category
1.Train no of 12801/02 Purushottam Superfast Express will be changed to 18401/18402 W.E.F 01.07.24
2.Train no. of 12892/91 PURI - BGY will be changed to 18404/18403 W.E.F 01.07.24.
52 Posts
Railway ministry ab Tughlak chalata hai.. So anything can happen. Aaj purushottam toh kal Tamilnadu, Telangana, Coromandel , Geetanjali pe bhi Aisa news aa jaega..
Instead of making such benchmark why don't IR try to make this train more faster and then set on their benchmark(I know this is next to impossible, this is fastest train on its route)
Aram se 65 kmph pe jaa sakti hai Purushottam. Useless halts need to be removed. Abhi hi 60 se upar hai. Nandan Kanan, Odisha Sampark Kranti and Purushottam can retain SF tag even if the SF category goes to 65 kmph, abit speed up and schedule adjustment is the necessity.
Focus of any minister is to get appreciation for their work. If it is short term succes then it is their best chance to do so. So current RM is focused on launching VBs and doesn't bother other things. He might approve to degrade 12801for their purposes. There won't be any response even if we raise this question.
IRI members, you must vote this.
Do you support the renumbering of Purushottam Express???????
Do you support the renumbering of Purushottam Express???????
3 Posts
1. Ashwini vaishanav told them to board the VB to disturb the onboard passengers.
2. He came kiul jn to make short circuit in memu for fire.
3. Suddenly he noticed...
more...
2. He came kiul jn to make short circuit in memu for fire.
3. Suddenly he noticed...
more...
Now if this get implemented, some kind shit everyone gonna face. Long queues in PRS counter on arrival of Purushottam Express, especially at ndls might be possible to take refund.
I don't support
In fact I want so called RM to eliminate the concept of rake standardization
Bahut bhala hoga
In fact I want so called RM to eliminate the concept of rake standardization
Bahut bhala hoga
I am still hoping that even this happens, it should be for temporary basis. This train was started in around 92 by former RM CK Jaffer. Even though other train on similar route existed. But this was started as Superfast Train. Never happened in 25 years, will be going to happen soon. Just hope for good, and try to do things which can be possible. Like, talking to a society(purpose should match) who can request to zone and writing letters and all.
One last thing, IR will only face loss in revenue...
more...
One last thing, IR will only face loss in revenue...
more...
Page# Showing 1 to 5 of 1932 blog entries next>>
Scroll to Top