Forum Super Search
 ♦ 
×
HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

Search
  Go  
Full Site Search
  Search  
 
Thu Nov 23, 2017 20:41:52 ISTHomeTrainsΣChainsAtlasPNRForumGalleryNewsFAQTripsLoginFeedback
Thu Nov 23, 2017 20:41:52 IST

Blog Entry# 1972492
Posted: Aug 25 2016 (20:34)

15 Responses
Last Response: Aug 26 2016 (11:07)
  
Rail News
0 Followers
2177 views
Aug 25 2016 (20:34)   Talgo trial runs conducted without safety clearance
 

Indian railways Project Swarn is great idea^~   979 news posts
Entry# 1972492   News Entry# 278168         Tags   Past Edits
A railway official said the Talgo run was only a trial and, in case of launch of commercial services, clearance from CRS would be taken
The Indian Railways’ trial runs of the high-speed train Talgo have come under the scanner with the Commissioner of Railway Safety (CRS) hauling up the national transporter for not seeking a safety clearance.
Talgo had trial runs in the high traffic routes of Delhi-Mumbai, Mathura-Palwal and Bareilly-Moradabad earlier this month, The fourth run was, however, abruptly postponed.
While
...
more...
the railways said the cancellation was because of heavy rains and because the Talgo team wanted a break and that the final trial is now likely to take place in September, official sources said CRS has in a letter written to the ministry of railways objected to the trials citing safety reasons.
The railways disregarded the letter, saying the Railway Board had already given clearance and that CRS takes an average time of 18 months to give clearance.
“The trial run was rushed without a clearance from CRS. Any trial run for trains above the speed of 130 km per hour needs clearance,” said an official privy to the matter. Besides rolling stock, reopening of new lines too require CRS clearance.
CRS deals with matters of safety of rail travel and train operations and is charged with statutory functions laid down in the Railways Act (1989), which are of an inspectorial, investigatory and advisory nature.
A railway official said the Talgo run was only a trial and, in case of launch of commercial services, clearance from CRS would be taken.
A former mechanical engineer of the Indian Railways, however, said it is mandatory to get CRS clearance even for trial runs. “In cases where an imported locomotive is transported from a port to railway workshop, CRS clearance is required. They cannot run a full train on the Delhi-Mumbai route without clearance. Who will take responsibility if the trial train falls on the adjoining track and people are killed?” he said.
The Talgo coaches were shipped from Spain to Mumbai at the company’s expense and, hence, the cost incurred by the railways was negligible. Earlier this month, Talgo became the fastest train to run in India, clocking a speed of 180 km per hour, covering the 84-km stretch between Mathura to Palwal in 38 minutes, breaking the record set by the Gatimaan express in April.
Though critics say Talgo failed to break speed benchmarks, the railways consider it a success.
During the first trial run between Delhi and Mumbai on August 2, the train took 15 hours and 50 minutes to reach the destination, as against the expected 12 hours and 47 minutes. In the second trial run on August 5, while the claim was 12.47 hours, it took 13.17 hours to reach the destination. During the third trial on August 9, the train took 12.56 hours, compared to a claim of 12.26 hours by the company.
“In all these cases, there were some unusual occurrences because of some technical issues with the railways that slowed the train’s speed. If you subtract this error, the train was successful,” said an official close to the development.
In comparison, the super-fast Rajdhani Express takes 15 hours and 50 minutes from New Delhi to Mumbai Central. While the average speed of the Rajdhani between New Delhi and Surat is 89.76 kmph, Talgo cloaked an average speed of 106.52 kmph. According to the railways, the train took 118 mins less than the Rajdhani on the stretch.
The first trial run suffered because of factors such as occurrences heavy rains between Surat and Mumbai Central. However, in the clear stretch from Mathura to Surat it took 85 minutes less than the Rajdhani. The second trial run was conducted at a maximum permissible speed of 130 kmph with cant deficiency value of 125 mm. The third trial run was conducted at a speed of 140 kmph with cant deficiency value of 125mm.
The Talgo that covered the Delhi-Mumbai route had nine coaches, comprising two executive coaches, four general coaches, a cafeteria, power car and a tail-end coach.

10 posts - Thu Aug 25, 2016

  
1959 views
Aug 26 2016 (02:03)
DhnEcr~   5926 blog posts
Re# 1972492-11            Tags   Past Edits
Jab after CRS ke train derail ho jati hai to kya uski responsibility CRS leta hai nahi na,

  
1824 views
Aug 26 2016 (02:12)
Atharva45^~   40206 blog posts   2693 correct pred (68% accurate)
Re# 1972492-12            Tags   Past Edits
Talgo train ka 4th trail rain ki vajah se nhi hua...

  
1804 views
Aug 26 2016 (02:13)
Indian railways Project Swarn is great idea^~   87620 blog posts   5325 correct pred (78% accurate)
Re# 1972492-13            Tags   Past Edits
sab koi alag alag reason batata hai ... xactly kisi ko nahi maloom kyun cancel hua..

  
1815 views
Aug 26 2016 (02:15)
Atharva45^~   40206 blog posts   2693 correct pred (68% accurate)
Re# 1972492-14            Tags   Past Edits
Aaj ek news channel pr aarha tha... Talgo staff ne bhi thoda aram ke liye time manga h...

  
1544 views
Aug 26 2016 (11:07)
Proud atheist~   4562 blog posts   37 correct pred (63% accurate)
Re# 1972492-15            Tags   Past Edits
To abhi kyu mar rahe hain crs wale ??inse zyada acchi technology to definitely hogi Spain ki talgo team ke paas jokhim ka aakalan karne k liye..

ARP (Advanced Reservation Period) Calculator

Reservations Open Today @ 8am for:
Trains with ARP 10 Dep on: Sun Dec 3
Trains with ARP 15 Dep on: Fri Dec 8
Trains with ARP 30 Dep on: Sat Dec 23
Trains with ARP 120 Dep on: Fri Mar 23

  
  

Rail News

New Trains

Site Announcements

  • Entry# 2547009
    Oct 16 2017 (10:21PM)


    As per the recent post , the new Pax Login feature has now been introduced. Here are the details of the feature set. . 1. Now you may login to the site as a Member or a Passenger, or BOTH Member & Passenger at the same time. Passenger login is called "Pax Login"...
  • Entry# 2517609
    Oct 11 2017 (09:33AM)


    As detailed here , last month, some changes were made to the PNR section. In the next phase of this rollout, we shall be further separating "Passengers" from "Members". . 1. "Passengers" will be able to login using ONLY their PNRs (no password). We shall have a Pax Login above the current...
  • Entry# 2418661
    Sep 25 2017 (07:09AM)


    @all: There are some changes coming to the PNR Forum. 1. All PNRs will be anonymized, i.e. you won't see who posted the PNRs or search PNRs by Traveller. This is to better protect the confidentiality of travelling members and their travel plans. However, members will still be able to search their OWN...
  • Entry# 2409730
    Sep 15 2017 (11:46PM)


    In recent times, the number of FM Complaints regarding "targeting me", "offensive content", "sarcastic comment", "bashing", etc. have been increasing. This has led to increased censorship and throttling of open discussions. . This is a clarification that this site is meant for a FREE EXCHANGE of ideas. Some arguments/debates/disagreements/jokes/sarcasm are ALLOWED and are...
  • Entry# 2390218
    Aug 25 2017 (12:59PM)


    There has been a partial rollout of a modification to Timeline entries. The implementation will be complete within a week. 1. Void & RAC buttons have been removed. . 2. TL Entries can now be Edited and Fixed by the original updater, if there are errors. So there is no need to Void TLs...
  • Entry# 2175399
    Feb 23 2017 (01:22PM)


    There has recently been a lot of frustration among RFs when their Station Pics, Loco Pics, Train Pics get rejected because the "number is not showing", "shed is not visible", the loco/train is at a distance, Train Board is too small, "better pic available", etc. . To address this issue, effective tomorrow, ALL...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Mobile site
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.