 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blog Entry# 3269192
Posted: Apr 04 2018 (15:14)
13 Responses
Last Response: Apr 12 2018 (08:19)
13 Responses
Last Response: Apr 12 2018 (08:19)
We all know that for a SF tag a train needs to have avg speed of 55 kmph or above. So what do you think
NO vote
THE AVG SPEED FOR SF TAG SHOULD BE INCREASED(PLZ MENTION THE LIMIT)
81%
30
THE AVG SPEED FOR SF TAG SHOULD BE DECREASED(PLZ MENTION THE LIMIT)
3%
1
KEEP IT AS IT IS
8%
3
MY OPINION IS.....(IN COMMENTS)
8%
3
8 Posts
There must be three types of speed categories :
Express for below 50
Fast express for above 50 but below 60
And superfast for above 60
In this way superfast charges should also categorised...
more...
Express for below 50
Fast express for above 50 but below 60
And superfast for above 60
In this way superfast charges should also categorised...
more...
Though difficult to implement, it can be customized route-wise. For example, on Delhi-Mumbai or Delhi-Kolkata route it should always be 60. Even shorter ICE SF trains running within those sections should adhere to 60KMPH avg. But on relatively slower routes like NFR 52-53 can also be considered.
Delhi-Kolkata route has very bad punctuality. Trains having 60+ avg. run heavily delayed (barring a few)
That's fine. I am okay with long journey trains. But I have serious objection especially with short journey ICE's like Coalfield, Black Diamond, Asansol ICE, Flying Ranee etc. They are charging extra fare by just showing this 55KMPH. Otherwise there are no reasons to declare them as SF.
Travel SAFE
1. RailFanning does NOT MEAN dangerous pics/videos.
2. Doorplating pics/youtube videos are strictly FORBIDDEN in IRI.
3. Take plenty of food pics and other safe pics.
4. Write human interest narratives to make the pics interesting.
5. Enjoy blogging and travelling SAFELY.
REMEMBER: YOUR LIFE is the most precious thing, NOT RailFanning.
Scroll to Top