Here is something interesting. Instead of a blog, let's see what the people think through the help of this poll.
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Have a look at these 2 TLs - where a member has, with the help of various data, updated the inaugural as 1891 /blog/post/3031608 and /blog/post/3031611
{
But...
more... within minutes of it being approved by a TLM, another TLM has created another 2 TLs and reverted it back.
/blog/post/3034461 and
/blog/post/3034361}
Now, please go through ALL the arguments of all the 4 blogs and give your opinion.
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
<
--- Request all TLMs and FMs/ex-FMs to give your view on this issue. This is not just an issue of a date but also a TLM who approved after reading the proof and then his stamp being overridden by another.
-- An interesting case for a FM - as to, how to tackle this issue.
- Let's make this an interesting poll and set emotions and "historic" emotions aside.
>
Member who has updated should be respected for his research and it should be 1891.
81%
22
No. Whims and fancies of the TLM should always take precedence.
0%
0
Moderator should intervene and speak up. He needs to stand up for members too.
7%
2
The first TLM who approved. has to object. since he stamped after due examination of the proof given.
4%
1
I don't care for these dates nor for these TLs or TLMs.
7%
2